My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013248
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
17749
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-90-1
>
SU0013248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:24:21 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 10:56:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013248
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
QX-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
17749
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
CLEMENTS
Zip
95227-
APN
01922024
ENTERED_DATE
5/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17749 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The San Joaquin County Air Basin is considered a "nonattainment' area with <br /> respect to ozone and PM-10. The project would contribute to emission of these <br /> constituents by generating an ozone precursor (NOx) and dust from excavation and haul <br /> roads; however, because of the small amount of these emissions, cumulative impacts <br /> should not be significant levels. <br /> Noise impacts from the project will contribute to existing noise levels, <br /> particularly along the southern boundary of the town of Clements. This area is currently <br /> subject to high noise impacts from traffic along Highway 88. Mitigation measures <br /> proposed in this EIR should reduce the cumulative impacts of the project to less than <br /> significant. <br /> 5.2 Growth inducement <br /> Although the project is located in a rural area of San Joaquin County, it would <br /> have little potential to induce growth. The project would not result in additional jobs, <br /> but would maintain employment for workers at the existing quarry for an additional 10 <br /> years. The project would locally result in a temporary loss of jobs (mostly seasonal) <br /> related to agricultural activity in the proposed quarry area. No new or additional <br /> services would be required. Although the project would generate construction materials, <br /> this would likely fill existing demands rather than promote new development activities. <br /> 112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.