My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
8751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516580
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:36 PM
Creation date
5/8/2020 1:56:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516580
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012688
FACILITY_NAME
WILD ROSE VINEYARDS
STREET_NUMBER
8751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
VICTOR
Zip
95253
APN
05139005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8751 E HWY 12
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY ORDER NO. 5-01-281 Z R. LAWSON ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA WILDROSE VINEYARDS <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Technical Report Due Date <br /> -Installation of the 12,000 gallon tank <br /> -Separation of wastewater <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Workplan 6 October 2000 <br /> Operation and Wastewater Management Plan 31 December 2000 <br /> Groundwater Well Installation Report 6 January 2001 <br /> 6. On 26 October 2000, staff issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) citing the Discharger for: a) failure <br /> to submit a report describing installation of a flow meter to measure the flow of winery wastewater <br /> to the land application areas, how stormwater flows had been separated from wastewater flows, the <br /> installation of the 12,000 gallon tank, and how the wastewater from the adjacent California Fruit <br /> Products facility had been separated from the winery wastewater; and b) failure to submit a <br /> groundwater monitoring well installation workplan. The NOV required the Discharger to submit <br /> the overdue reports by 8 December 2000. The Discharger failed to submit the reports by the <br /> 8 December 2000 date. <br /> 7. On 28 December 2000, staff contacted the Discharger by telephone inquiring about the overdue <br /> reports and failure to submit self-monitoring reports. Staff advised the Discharger the continued <br /> pattern of noncompliance would likely result in an enforcement action, including imposition of an <br /> Administrative Civil Liability(ACL). <br /> 8. On 21 March 2001, staff provided a conditional approval of a Draft Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Workplan. As required by WDRs Provision F.2.b, the workplan was to be submitted by 6 October <br /> 2000; however, the draft workplan was not received at the Regional Board office until 16 January <br /> 2001. Staff's conditional approval required that technical issues be addressed in a final workplan, <br /> which was to be signed and stamped by a California Registered Engineer or Geologist. Submittal <br /> of the final report was required by 21 April 2001. The Discharger failed to submit the report. The <br /> conditional approval letter also required the Discharger to expedite installation of the monitoring <br /> wells, because the Discharger was significantly behind the schedule contained in the WDRs. <br /> 9. On I 1 April 2001, staff contacted the Discharger by facsimile machine, stating that a number of <br /> items required in the WDRs had not been satisfied, monitoring reports had not been submitted, and <br /> that continued noncompliance could result in an ACL. <br /> 10. On 11 April 2001, the Discharger submitted self-monitoring reports for the months of January <br /> 2001, February 2001, and March 2001. On 30 November 2001, the Discharger hand delivered an <br /> additional six self-monitoring reports in response to the proposed ACL. All of the reports are <br /> incomplete because they did not include flow rates and did not contain monitoring of sulfate and <br /> total dissolved solids concentrations in the wastewater applied to the land application areas, as <br /> required by Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) No. 5-00-182. Since adoption of Order <br /> No. 5-00-182 in August 2000, the Discharger has failed to submit any other monthly monitoring <br /> reports. The MRP states that all monitoring reports are required to be submitted pursuant to <br /> Section 13267 of the CWC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.