Agenda -2- 6/7 December 2001
<br /> TIME LIMITATIONS
<br /> In order to move the Board meeting along in a timely manner, and assure
<br /> time for adequate consideration of items later in the Agenda, the Chair may
<br /> enforce maximum time limitations on each item. The goal is to complete all
<br /> presentations, cross-examination, Board deliberation and voting within the
<br /> allotted time. Allotted times are listed on the agenda following each item.
<br /> Please consider the allotted time when preparing your presentations.
<br /> Thursday, 6 December— Agenda — 1:00 p.m.
<br /> INTRODUCTIONS
<br /> 1. Introductions,pledge of allegiance,and approval of minutes of the 443rd Regular Meeting of 19 October 2001.
<br /> 2. Meeting Rules and Procedures
<br /> 3. Executive Officer's Report
<br /> 4. Board Member Communications-Regional Board Members and the State Board Liaison Member may discuss
<br /> meetings, communications, correspondence,or other items ofgeneral interest relating to matters within the Board's
<br /> jurisdiction. There will be no voting orfortnal action taken.
<br /> 5. Public Forum-Any member of the public may address the Board on any matter within the Board's jurisdiction and
<br /> not scheduled for consideration at this meeting(5 minute time limit per subject)1:00 p.m.
<br /> 6. Budget and Program Review—A Status Report(Richard Loncarovich] (916)255-2039] (Time Limit 30 minutes)
<br /> 7. Development of Monitoring Programs Addressing Discharges from Irrigated Lands—A Workshop [Rudy
<br /> Schnagl(916)255-3101]
<br /> NPDES PERMITS
<br /> 8. El Dorado Irrigation District,Deer Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant,EI Dorado County—Consideration of
<br /> NPDES Permit Amendment[Kyle Ericson(916)255-3364)
<br /> 9. Closed Session-The Regional Board may meet in closed session to consider personnel matters[Authority:Government
<br /> Code Section 11126(a)],to discuss either matters in litigation or decisions to initiate litigation[Authority:Government
<br /> Code Section 11126(e)],or to deliberate on a decision to be reached based upon evidence introduced in a hearing
<br /> [Authority:Government Code Section 11126(c)(3)Items that may be discussed: CVRWQCB v.Masami Cattle Ranch,Inc.
<br /> et al., Tehama County Superior Court Case No.47049;CVRWQCB v.Cedar Point Properties,et al,Plumes County
<br /> Superior Court Case No. 19897; United States v.Aerojet-General Corporation,et al., CIVS 86-08083 and CVRWQCB et
<br /> al.v.Aerojet-General Corporation,et al,County of Sacramento Superior Court Case No.186073, Consolidated with Case
<br /> Nos. 288302 and 191981; American Slates Water Company,et al., v. CVRWQCB et al.,Sacramento County Superior Court
<br /> Case No.99 AS 05947;Regents of the University of California v. CVRWQCB, Yola County Case No.P798-1540;
<br /> Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v.State Water Resources Control Board,et al.,Sacramento County
<br /> Superior Court Case No.98CS01702,State of California,Department of Toxic Substances Control and CVRWQCB v.Iron
<br /> Mountain Mines,Inc.et al., U.S.District Court,Eastern District of Calif.,Case No. CIV-S-91-1167-DFL-PAN and United
<br /> States v.Iron Mountain Mines,Inc.et al., U.S.District Court,Eastern District of Calif,Case No.S-91-0768 DFL/JFM;
<br /> State of California ex rel California Integrated Waste Management Board et al. v.Edward Joseph Filbin et al.(Filbin Tire
<br /> Fire);City of Merced,et al.,v.R.A.Fields,et al., (U.S.Dist. Ct.E.D.Calif.)No. CV F 92-5627 RECIDLB,National Park
<br /> Service,El Portal Wastewater Treatment Facility,Administrative Civil Liability Order No.5-01-031;San Francisco
<br /> Baykeeper,Inc.,et al. v.California State Water Resources Control Board,et al.,Sacramento County Superior Court Case
<br /> No.99CS02712;and Coalition for Alternatives to Kiefer Landfill v. California State Water Resources Control Board,et al.,
<br /> Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 01CS00718, City of Turlock,Municipal Services Department v.SWRCB and
<br /> CBR WQCB,Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No.191436;People of the State of California by and through the
<br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region,v. California Ammonia Company,a California
<br /> Corporation, Case No. CV 013950,CVRWQCB v.A Greener Globe Corp.,et al.,Sacramento Superior Court
<br />
|