Laserfiche WebLink
' In March 2002, a 2,000-gallon diesel UST was removed from the site The UST was located <br /> about 120 feet from the former heating oil UST and had contained fuel for an emergency backup <br />' power generator During removal activities, groundwater was encountered at a depth of <br /> approximately 12 feet below surface grade (bsg) A soil sample collected from the north end of <br />' the excavation contained 13 parts per million(ppm) of total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel <br /> (TPH-D), and a sample collected from the pipeline trench contained 5 0 ppm TPH-D A <br /> groundwater sample collected from the excavation contained 130 parts per billion(ppb) of TPH- <br /> D (IT, 2002b) Stockpiled soils were used to backfill the UST excavation following removal <br />' activities Analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples are presented in Tables 2 and 3, <br /> and depicted in Figures 3 and 4 <br /> In September 2002, at the request of the SJCEHD, six direct-push soil borings were made on <br /> both sides of the 2,000-gallon diesel UST, along the fuel piping system, and in the direction of <br />' groundwater flow Analysis of the soil samples detected TPH-D in one of the borings at a <br /> concentration of 2 7 ppm No benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) constituents <br />' or methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) were detected in any of the soil samples (IT, 2002c) The <br /> soil analytical results are summarized in Table 4 and depicted in Figure 5 Copies of the boring <br /> lie logs are included in Appendix B <br /> Groundwater was encountered during boring activities at depths ranging from 11 feet to 14 feet <br /> rbsg Analysis of groundwater samples collected from three of the borings detected TPH-D at <br /> concentrations ranging from 50 ppb to 390 ppb No BTEX constituents or MTBE were detected <br /> in the samples Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 5 and depicted in <br /> Figure 6 <br /> In April 2003, a site conceptual model (SCM) was completed for the site by Shaw The results <br /> of the SCM indicate numerous UST systems existed on nearby properties The majority of these <br /> UST systems were located to the south, in the anticipated upgradient direction Subsurface <br /> impact was confirmed upon removal of several of the UST systems Contaminants from some of <br /> these former UST systems may have impacted groundwater conditions at the SBC site (Shaw, <br /> 2003a) <br /> In July 2003, three monitoring wells were installed at the site The wells were screened from 8 to <br />' 23 feet bsg, i e , across the water table Soil samples were collected from depths of 10 and <br />' CNCDISHAREIUS11V4-0001 doc <br /> 2 <br />