Laserfiche WebLink
CAMBRIA <br /> HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTION IN GROUNDWATER <br /> Cambna collected groundwater samples from boring CPT-1 at approximate depth intervals of <br /> 35-39 fbg, 50-54 fbg, 74-78 fbg, 82-86 fbg, 104-108, and 111-114 fbg <br /> No TPHg, BTEX, or lead scavengers were detected in groundwater samples from boring CPT-1 <br /> MTBE was detected in groundwater samples from every depth interval in boring CPT-1 at <br /> concentrations ranging from 12 to 81 Parts per billion (ppb) TBA was detected in the <br /> groundwater sample collected from 111-114 fbg at a concentration of 51 fbg No other fuel <br /> oxygenates were detected from boring CPT-1 TPHd was detected in groundwater samples from <br /> boring CPT-1 at concentrations ranging from 140 to 340 ppb The laboratory noted that the <br /> hydrocarbons reported as diesel do not exhibit a typical diesel chromatographic pattern <br /> Therefore these results may be anomalous <br /> The groundwater chemical analytical data are summarized on Table 3 and shown on Figure 2 <br /> The certified analytical report is presented in Appendix B <br /> . CONCLUSIONS <br /> One exploratory soil boring (CPT-1) was drilled dunng this investigation to assess the vertical <br /> extent of impacted soil and groundwater beneath the site Soil sampling analytical results from <br /> boring CPT-1 indicate the vertical extent of gasoline and diesel constituents in the soil beneath <br /> the site is defined as no gasoline or diesel constituents were detected below 10 fbg <br /> TPHd was detected in groundwater samples collected from boring CPT-1, however, the <br /> laboratory noted that the hydrocarbons reported as diesel do not exhibit a typical diesel <br /> chromatographic pattern Therefore,these results may be anomalous <br /> Additionally, the concentration of TPHd and MTBE detected in every groundwater sample from <br /> boring CPT-1 is relatively the same Since the concentrations remain relatively constant as the <br /> sample depth increases, this suggests that there may have been mixing of shallow impacted <br /> groundwater with deeper zone groundwater during drilling and/or sampling activities We have <br /> seen similar anomalies at other sites where we have performed vertical extent investigations in, <br /> or near, the source area where shallow groundwater is impacted with gasoline constituents <br /> The former water supply well (RW) at this site was located approximately 18 feet away from <br /> . boring CPT-1 (Figure 2) Prior to properly destroying well RW we collected a groundwater <br /> 0813 5 <br />