My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2008 - 2011
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
85
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231656
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2008 - 2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2022 1:11:57 PM
Creation date
5/8/2020 3:44:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2008 - 2011
RECORD_ID
PR0231656
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0003635
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 06080
STREET_NUMBER
85
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19627010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
85 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nitoring System Certification <br /> ie Address: 85 E LOUISE AVE Date of Testing/Service: 08/25/2009 <br /> PTO N-71 <br /> F. In-Tank Gauging / SIR Equipment <br /> ❑ Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. <br /> ❑ Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. <br /> Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. <br /> Thi section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. <br /> Con plete the following checklist: <br /> aYes ❑No Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination,including testing for ground faults? <br /> OYes ❑No Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? <br /> Q Yes ❑No Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? <br /> ElYes ❑No Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? <br /> Fx1 Yes ❑No^ Were all probes reinstalled properly? <br /> OYes ❑No^ Were all items on the equipment manufacturers'maintenance checklist completed? <br /> In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD) ❑ Check this box if LLDs are not installed. <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification,was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? <br /> IT Yes ❑No ❑N/A (Check all that apply)Simulated leak rate: Q 3 g.p.h ❑0.1 g.p.h 00.2 g.p.h <br /> x Yes ❑No Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? <br /> F7]Yes ❑No Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A For mechanical LLDs,does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No• 0 N/A For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No' ❑x N/A For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No- 0 N/A For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? <br /> ❑Yes ❑No• ❑x N/A For electronic LLDs,have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? <br /> ❑Yes I❑No' Were all items on the equipment manufacturers'maintenance checklist completed? <br /> In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> H. Comments: <br /> Page 3 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.