Laserfiche WebLink
LG 144 A Page 1 of 2 <br /> LG 144 <br /> MONITORING AND UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS FOR HYBRID TANK SYSTEMS <br /> (DOUBLE-WALL TANKS WITH SINGLE-WALL PIPING) <br /> CONTAINING MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL <br /> January 22, 1996 <br /> To: Local Agencies and Other Interested Parties <br /> Some motor vehicle fuel Underground Storage Tank(UST) systems installed between January 1, <br /> 1984 and July 1, 1987 have double-wall tanks and single-wall piping. These systems are generally <br /> referred to as "hybrid systems." This letter is to clarify the monitoring and upgrade requirements for <br /> hybrid systems. <br /> Section 25291(a)(7)(E) of the Health and Safety Code (H&SC) "grandfathered" hybrid systems and <br /> exempted the single-wall piping from secondary containment requirements if certain monitoring <br /> methods are used to monitor both the tank and piping. In the past, we interpreted Sections <br /> 25291(a)(7)(C) & (D) and 25292(b)(4) H&SC as follows: The tank must have inventory <br /> reconciliation, annual tightness testing, and monitoring of the interstitial space (daily manual <br /> monitoring or continuous monitoring). The piping system must have an automatic line leak detector <br /> (to perform an hourly 3 gph test)plus either an annual line tightness test(0.1 gph test) or a monthly <br /> 0.2 gph line test. <br /> Many local implementing agency inspectors and tank owners believe that these requirements are <br /> excessive. Many owners of these hybrid systems are monitoring their tanks with a continuous <br /> interstitial monitoring device that is connected to an audible and visual alarm. They check their <br /> monitoring systems annually to verify proper operation in compliance with state regulations. Owners <br /> believe,therefore, that performing inventory reconciliation and annual tightness tests on these tanks <br /> is unnecessarily redundant. These requirements do not provide an incentive for tank owners to use the <br /> more reliable continuous interstitial monitoring method instead of manual monitoring. We believe <br /> the following to be a reasonable and acceptable alternative interpretation to the one we have <br /> expressed in the past: <br /> If the interstitial space of the tank is continuously monitored. . . <br /> Monitoring the interstitial space of the double-wall tank in a hybrid system with a continuous <br /> monitoring device satisfies the inventory reconciliation and tank tightness testing requirements of <br /> Sections 25291(a)(7)(D) and 25292(b)(4) H&SC, if the continuous monitoring device is: <br /> • connected to an audible and visual alarm, and <br /> • checked annually for proper operation(in accordance with manufacturer's instructions) <br /> If the interstitial space of the tank is not continuously monitored . . . <br /> Inventory reconciliation(either manual or statistical) and an annual tank tightness test must be <br /> performed in addition to monitoring the interstitial space. <br /> DECEMBER 22, 1998 UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS <br /> Piping <br /> Hybrid motor vehicle fuel systems are grandfathered by law; therefore, there is no requirement to <br /> replace the single-wall piping of these systems with double-wall piping to meet the upgrade deadline. <br /> However, any such piping that is in direct contact with soil must be upgraded with corrosion <br /> http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/—cwphome/ust/1g-144.htm 12/17/98 <br />