My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REMOVAL_2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
85
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231656
>
REMOVAL_2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 10:43:55 AM
Creation date
5/12/2020 8:55:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
REMOVAL
FileName_PostFix
2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231656
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0003635
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 06080
STREET_NUMBER
85
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19627010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
85 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Is Data Valid? (circle) Preservation Temperature <br /> ;,,Eā,, (If Known) <br /> 2.7(°C) <br /> Stantec Lab Validation Form <br /> Project/Client: ARCO Service Station No. 6080 <br /> Project No.: 211602061.400.672 <br /> Lab Work Order No.: 10-12-0722 <br /> Date of Validation: 12/10/2010 <br /> Date of Analysis: 12/09ā12/10/2010 <br /> Date of Sampling: 12/08/2010 <br /> Completed By: Jose Yan <br /> Circle/Highlight <br /> Signature: Yes or No <br /> 1. Was the analysis the o requested? Yes No <br /> 2. Do the sample number(s) on the chain-of-custody (COC) match the one(s) that Yes No <br /> appear on the laboratory data sheet? <br /> 3. Were all samples prepared (extracted, filtered, etc.) within EPA holding times? Yes No <br /> 4. Once prepared/extracted, were all the samples analyzed within the EPA holding Yes No <br /> times? <br /> Yes No <br /> 5. Were Laboratory blanks performed, if so, were they below non-detect? <br /> Yes No <br /> 6. Are the units correct? (i.e., soil samples in mg/kg or pg/g, water samples mg/L, pg/L, <br /> and air samples in volume mg/m^3, etc.) <br /> Yes No <br /> 7. Were appropriate Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) samples <br /> included in the laboratory batch sample? <br /> Yes No <br /> 8. In lieu of MS/ MSD, were surrogate spike (SS) or surrogate spike duplicate (SSD) <br /> samples included in the laboratory batch samples? <br /> Yes No <br /> 9. Were MS/ MSD (or SS/SSD) within the acceptable range of% recovery (i.e., approx <br /> 80-120% depending on analyte)? <br /> Yes No <br /> 10.Were MS/MSD (or SS/SSD) values used to calculate Relative Percent Difference <br /> (RPD)? Yes No <br /> 11. Were RPD values within the acceptable range (i.e. ± 25%)? <br /> If any answer is no, explain why and what corrective action was taken: <br /> Lab Validation Form.doc Stantec <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.