My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:07 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� r <br /> { NwI r..1 <br /> Port of Stockton page 2 <br /> Site 3, Port Roads 13, 14 & G. <br /> Approval of requests for no further action or evaluations of remedial alternatives are <br /> based on a complete subsurface picture of the impact and residual mass of petroleum. <br /> EHD recommends that if the existing monitoring wells must be removed, additional, <br /> multi-leveled monitoring wells be reinstalled in this area. <br /> Soil boring "133-5" yielded elevated levels of petroleum in groundwater samples collected <br /> from 20' bgs (610,000 ugll TPHg and 19,000 ugll Benzene) and 40'bgs (220 ug/l TPHg <br /> and 10 ugll Benzene). The screened interval for the well proposed in this area is from <br /> 10' to 25' bgs only. EHD concurs with your consultant's proposal to place a new <br /> monitoring well in this area, but questions why no screened interval is proposed for the <br /> sands at 34' to 40' bgs where petroleum constituents were also detected. A separate <br /> and deeper-screened monitoring well should be placed in this zone to provide <br /> repeatable confirmation groundwater sampling from depths where the previous <br /> investigation encountered the petroleum constituents. The vertical extent of the <br /> petroleum impact is to be defined before remedial alternatives or closure requests can <br /> be evaluated by EHD. <br /> Analyses for MtBE, lead scavengers, and the other oxygenates were not included in this <br /> last phase of investigation. EHD will require analyses for these constituents by EPA <br /> Method 82606 and AA 6010. lf, after two consecutive groundwater sampling events <br /> indicate that these constituents are not present, EHD will accept and approve a request <br /> to discontinue these analyses. <br /> Monitoring well installation and destruction permits are issued after your submitted work <br /> plan has been approved by EHD. The well permit application forms and associated fees <br /> (installations, $891 destructions, $60) may be submitted with the work pian, or you can <br /> wait until the work plan is approved. <br /> I hope these comments provide you with some guidance with your upcoming <br /> investigation phase. You may contact me at minfurna s'cehd.com or by phone at (209) <br /> 468-3454 should you have any questions. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Z <br /> mental Health Division <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr., Senior REHS Nuel C. Henderson, Jr. R.G. <br /> LOP 1 Site Mitigation Unit IV LOP I Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> MI/ <br /> c: CVRWQCB— Marty Hartzell, Sacramento. <br /> c: Geomatrix— Brad Loewen, 2444 Main St, #215 Fresno, CA. 93721-2734. <br /> c: SWRCB-CUF —Mark Owens, Sacramento. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.