My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:07 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday,April 12,.2006. 11:55.AM <br /> To: 'Steve Brumm' <br /> Subject:.RE: UST##3..for Port of Stockton ' <br /> I see.. i <br /> back on Oct 3I., 20051 I discovered there were NO Geotracker submittals for this . <br /> site. I advised Rita. Koehnen that this was a problem and to get up to. speed. I'd. <br /> check in a week, Nov. 7. <br /> Althought there. weren't any by then, the work to. GET them on. started and. that t <br /> pretty much satified. my regulatory. concerns.. <br /> Since that time we've. (you) have corrected.and responded to my comments and. <br /> I'm ok with. how it's going. <br /> You (POS UST#3). have no. Geotracker.. deadline concerns/problems as of. today. <br /> Just keep uploading regularly (as data is analyzed). <br /> I'm not sure what your plans. are for OTHER than the MW sampling (QMRs), but <br /> with the gw concentrations too high to close as is, I'm thinking. further <br /> investigation and/or remediation may be warranted to gain the No Further Action. i <br /> classification. <br /> are you in this loop of 'future'. plans for this site,. or is that GeoMatrix only? <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Steve Brumm [maiito:sbrumm@wgr-sw.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:35 AM i <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: UST#3 for Port of Stockton <br /> 1 called Geotracker todayand they told me deadlines are u to the local agency. Wei typically find that each <br /> Y pYp Y <br /> regulator.has a letter that states when submissions to Geotracker are due for a given site, so I thought that <br /> such a letter may exist from you. <br /> Thanks for the help. <br /> Steve <br /> Steve Brumm <br /> WGR Southwest, Inc. <br /> 315 W..Pine.Street, Suite 8 <br /> Lodi, CA.95240 <br /> office (209)334-5363 ext. 205 <br /> cell (209)649-1821 <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> 4/19/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.