My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:07 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> l <br /> t <br /> ' I <br /> M RE:Port of Stockton UST#3-Message(HTML) <br /> Fie Edit„Vim+ Insert Formak Tom Arians <br /> a: Ztiorrffm� <br /> Normal Arial C^10 B 7. <br /> To... Steve Brumm <br /> Subject RE;Port of 5tockton UST#3 <br /> ........ — <br /> it's novo Friday the 13th of January. <br /> I clot a chance to view your latest submittal,with confirmation# 1251683056, Submitted on 1!10.MG and contained only three points of data.,(supplemental) <br /> I'm confused nowr <br /> the three samples are MW3-4 and 3-5 for Benzene sampled on'I2-21-05. The last one is IvIVV3-4 for GPO,also sampled on 12-21-05. My confusion is with the"4Qo5 GW <br /> Monitoring Report(04 2005)submittted on 12,rf?05 for sampling on 1112205, that I denied <br /> I'received'this denied report today...the SITE#3 is ok fine, My concern is why are the sampling dates different? why only Berizene foo the wells and only GRO for the <br /> other? and why duplicate these? why"SUPPLFMENT.=%L'?? problem with the 11!22 data??? <br /> i ' <br /> the 04 2005 report HAS Benzene data far A W-1-4 and 3.5,Nath lits of 200 u /I and 17 a fI respectively...+...1 et the 12-21 data'supplemental'has Benzene as 1.4 u fl and i <br /> p ' g y p ', 1 P p - 9 <br /> <0-5 ugll,respectively?????9 <br /> i <br /> call me at 209-468-3454...1 need to clear this latest suhrnittal up before I accept any mote data. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From:Steve Brumm[mailtD:sbrumm@wgr-sw.com] . <br /> Sent:Tuesday,January 10,2006 5:09 PM <br /> To:Mike Infurna[EH] <br /> Cc:Rita Koehnen;James Neal <br /> Subject:Port of Stockton UST#3 <br /> € E: <br /> F: <br /> I have loaded the EDF for the lab for 21 Dec 115 on Geotracker. <br /> Reminder the name of chis site on Geotracker has been changed to UST#3.There are still two items that need to be accepted by you,which were previously denied <br /> due to the site name being wrong. <br /> Thank you for your help. <br /> Steve Brumm <br /> WGR Southwest,Inc. <br /> 315 W. Pine Street,Suite 8 <br /> Lodi,CA 95240 <br /> —.._ — — <br /> i�5tart '�� ” " �®Deleted Items�tdrtrdsoFt ��F�Port of Stockion WST�3 ARE.Port`s Stocktonll>°E` = �� �� r�r 'Jf t0 Si AM� <br /> (e <br /> 141 61 <br /> o� ,et-A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.