My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009318
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 2:41:53 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 2:07:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009318
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 - - <br /> GEOMArRIX <br /> Mr Michael M Luksic, R G <br /> Port of Stockton <br />' May 17, 2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> boring were analyzed for TPHg and BTEX compounds by Precision Enviro-Tech Analytical <br />' Laboratory of Stockton, California None of these compounds were detected in any of the soil <br /> or groundwater samples collected during the additional assessment Analytical results are <br /> shown on Figure 2, laboratory analytical data sheets are included in Appendix A <br />' As discussed in the February 5, 2002 letter, impact to groundwater and soil appears to be <br /> limited to the 20-foot depth zone Geologic cross sections of the site were prepared to show <br />' the lithology and subsurface distribution of PHCs detected in groundwater (Appendix A) The <br /> impacted groundwater and soil are limited to a small area, both horizontally and vertically <br /> (Figure 2 and Appendix B) <br /> Based on results from this and previous investigations, we recommend installing two ground- <br /> water monitoring wells near the downgradient edge of PHC-impacted groundwater, one <br />' groundwater monitoring well upgradient of PHC impacted groundwater, and one groundwater <br /> monitoring well within PHC impacted groundwater (Figure 3) Based on the observed vertical <br /> extent of impact, we recommend that the monitoring wells be screened from 10 to 25 feet bgs <br /> Additionally, in order to limit potential vertical migration of PHCs in groundwater, we <br /> recommend drilling out and abandoning the three existing on-site monitoring wells, which are <br /> screened both in and below the impacted 20-foot depth interval <br /> Geomatnx Consultants Inc is pleased to be of service to the Port of Stockton Please call if <br /> you have any questions about this report <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS, INC `S�r4�iED GFp�D <br /> No <br /> .rrZ/ Exp L <br /> Bradley A oewen, R G 4Phili Ross, R G tp <br /> Project Geologist Senior Hydrogeologist OF CAUF��� <br /> Enclosures Figure 1 —Location Map <br /> Figure 2— Geoprobe Sample Locations and No Detect Line <br /> Figure 3 — Proposed Monitoring Well Locations <br /> Appendix A —Laboratory Analytical Data Sheets & Chain-of-Custody Records <br /> Appendix B —Geological Cross Sections <br /> I 1PROJECM000s16437 00016437-Site3 Ph2 LatVert Results doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.