Laserfiche WebLink
1990) Data from nearby studies within the Port area indicate a soil profile to a depth of about 20 <br />' feet bsg consisting of interbedded sands and clays, mostly under reduced conditions (Sierra-Pacific <br /> Groundwater Consultants [SPGC], 1994) <br /> Lithologic data at Site 3 indicate that, in general, the interval from roughly 13 to 23 feet bsg beneath <br /> the former tanks comprises mostly silt, clayey silt, and clay Silty sand occurs below this interval, <br /> which grades downward into loose, dark gray to greenish-gray, poorly-graded sand This dark gray <br /> sand was observed in all three borings from approximately 30 to 41 feet bsg, the total depth <br /> explored <br />' Data from nearby studies indicate that the current depth to groundwater in the vicinity ranges from <br /> about 5 to 10 feet bsg (SPGC, 1998, and EMCON, 1998) Seasonal fluctuations in the water table <br /> appear to range from about 3 to 5 feet, with some as much as 6 to 9 feet Tank removal inspection <br />' records for Port sites (dating back to 1987) indicate that no groundwater was encountered during <br /> excavation or soil resampling to a depth of as much as 16 feet bsg Water levels in this area have <br /> risen as much as 8 feet since 1994, 2 to 3 feet of which appear to be attributable to the heavy and <br /> prolonged El Nino rainfalls the winter of 1997 Water levels measured in the three initial bonngs at <br /> Site 3 on August 7, 1998 ranged from about 9 5 to 12 feet bsg Based on nearby studies (SPGC, <br /> 1998 & EMCON, 1998) groundwater flow directions in the vicinity appear to be variable, ranging <br />' from west northwest to east southeast Flow direction changes may be due to tidal influences <br /> produced by the deep water channel to the north and the San Joaquin River to the west and <br /> southwest of the Port complex <br /> M <br /> HISTORY OF SITE WORK <br />' Two underground storage tanks {USTs) were removed from the site on February 16, 1988 They <br /> consisted of two, 12,000-gallon capacity, steel, USTs, which both contained unleaded gasoline <br />' Upon removal of the USTs, discolored gray soil and strong petroleum product odors were detected <br /> at the southern ends of both tanks Minor petroleum product odor was detected at the north end of <br /> Tank#1, while no odor was detected at the north end of Tank#4 <br /> Four soil samples were collected by `California Water Labs' <br /> (CWL) from the ends of the USTs <br />' subsequent to excavation on February 16, 1988 from a depth of approximately 13 feet bsg No <br /> groundwater was encountered during excavation or sampling <br />' Four additional soil samples were collected by CWL on March 15, 1988 These samples were <br /> collected from the same locations as during the tank pulls, but from a depth of 16 feet bsg A <br /> review of the SJCEHD inspection report indicates that the inspector found "gray soil observed on <br />' all samples with petroleum-like odor" The report also notes that no groundwater was encountered <br /> to a depth of 16 feet bsg Soil samples collected from beneath the tanks were submitted to CWL for <br /> analysis All soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and <br />' total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) by EPA method 8020 Selected samples were <br /> analyzed for ethylene dibromide (EDB) by EPA method 8010, and total lead Analytical results <br /> indicated low levels of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) detected in the initial soil samples, <br />' primarily in the samples collected at the south ends of the tanks where petroleum product odor was <br /> usr sAC3 gtre doc 3 <br />