Laserfiche WebLink
1990) Data from nearby studies within the Port area indicate a soil profile to a depth of about 20 <br /> feet bsg consisting of interbedded sands and clays, mostly under reduced conditions (Sierra-Pacific <br />' Groundwater Consultants [SPGC], 1994) <br /> Lithologic data at Site 3 indicate that,in general, the interval from roughly 13 to 23 feet bsg beneath <br />' the former tanks comprises mostly silt, clayey silt, and clay Silty sand occurs below this interval, <br /> which grades downward into loose, dark gray to greenish-gray, poorly-graded sand This dark gray <br /> sand was observed in all three borings from approximately 30 to 41 feet bsg, the total depth <br />' explored <br /> Data from nearby studies indicate that the current depth to groundwater in the vicinity ranges from <br /> about 5 to 10 feet bsg. (SPGC, 1998, and EMCON, 1998) Seasonal fluctuations in the water table <br />' appear to range from about 3 to 5 feet, with some as much as 6 to 9 feet Tank removal inspection <br /> records for Port sites (dating back to 1987) indicate that no groundwater was encountered during <br />' excavation or soil resampling to a depth of as much as 16 feet bsg Water levels in this area have <br /> risen as much as 8 feet since 1994, 2 to 3 feet of which appear to be attributable to the heavy and <br /> prolonged El Nino rainfalls the winter of 1997 Water levels measured in the three initial borings at <br /> Site 3 on August 7, 1998 ranged from about 9 5 to 12 feet bsg Based on nearby studies (SPGC, <br /> 1998 & EMCON, 1998) groundwater flow directions in the vicinity appear to be variable, ranging <br /> from west northwest to east southeast Flow direction changes may be due to tidal influences <br /> produced by the deep water channel to the north and the San Joaquin River to the west and <br /> southwest of the Port complex <br /> HISTORY OF SITE WORK <br />' 1988 <br /> During removal of two underground storage tanks (USTs) in 1988, approximately 180 cubic <br /> yards of soil were excavated with the tanks to a depth of about 11 feet bgs (Boyajian & Ross, <br /> 1998) Discolored gray soil with strong petroleum odors was observed at the southern ends of <br /> the tanks Soil samples were collected near the ends of the USTs from depths of approximately <br />' 13 and 16 feet bgs No groundwater was encountered during excavation or sampling to a depth <br /> of 16 feet bgs <br /> These soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline <br /> (TPHg) and total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel using United States Environmental <br /> Protection Agency(EPA) Method 8020 Selected samples were analyzed for ethylene dibromnde <br />' (EDB)using EPA Method 8010, and for total lead Analytical results indicated low levels of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs) in the soil samples, primarily those collected at the <br /> south ends of the tanks PHC concentrations in the 16-foot samples were significantly lower than <br /> 1 those of the 13-foot samples EDB was not detected in these samples Lead was detected at 6 to <br /> 12 4 milligrams per kilogram in the 13-foot samples collected from the north ends of both tanks, <br /> but was not detected in the samples collected at 16 feet bgs <br />' ust stte3 qtr]3 doe 2 <br /> 1 <br />