My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY_CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
SITE HISTORY_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 4:16:12 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 2:59:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> Mr. 'Dan Moe <br /> ' August 14, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> As discussed with Mr. Meckler, the existence of a bankruptcy <br /> proceeding does not stop a government agency from issuing orders <br /> to require compliance with health and safety laws. The federal <br /> courts have clearly affirmed the power of an agency, such as the <br /> Health District, to issue a compliance order in a case such as <br /> this, e.g. , In re Quanta Resources Corp. , 739 F.2d 912 (3rd Cir. <br /> 1984) . — <br /> In addition to Energy Petroleum, the Bank of Stockton also <br /> qualifies as an "owner" or "operator" within the definition of the <br /> Health & Safety Code. The enclosed bankruptcy papers shows that <br /> the Bank is listed as having a security interest in the equipment <br /> and fixtures belonging to Energy Petroleum, which includes the <br /> underground storage tanks located on Port property and owned by <br /> Energy Petroleum. Further, when Energy Petroleum ceased to do <br /> business the Bank "stepped into the shoes" -Energy Petroleum's <br /> shoes, began making the monthly lease payments on the property, <br /> and proceeded to take possession of_assets bf Energy. Petroleum for <br /> purposes of .seiiing them. The extent to which the tanks may have <br /> been operated while under Bank control has not yet been <br /> determined. <br /> Because the Bank was unable to sell the bulk plant and <br /> underground storage tanks, the Bank has attempted to abandon them. <br /> the <br /> ground <br /> storae tanksank by reason is exercise held ible of",: sor the securitydinterest <br /> g However, Y 'interests <br /> and voluntary possession, hotemporary, of the tanks. - <br /> _._� _.._.,. wever w_..,_....._...�,._ . . - - - - <br /> Our present understanding is that no permits have been issued <br /> to any underground tanks on the Energy Petroleum property. <br /> Additionally, such requirements as precision testing, pipeline <br /> leak testing, dispenser meter calibrations .!and quarterly <br /> statements have never been met by Energy , Petroleum. <br /> You have also informed us that if the ":tanks owned by Energy <br /> Petroleum are empty, then the proper agency to order their closure <br /> or removal is the fire department. This would be done through the <br /> issuance of a 90-day notice, which if unheeded will be turned over <br /> to the District Attorney for further action. If the tanks still <br /> contain product, then your- department will handle the matter. You <br /> indicated that you will begin taking such actions in mid-August to <br /> resolve this matter in cooperation with the District Attorney's <br /> office. <br /> As set forth above, and as confirmed by the enclosed <br /> documentation, the Port is neither the owner nor the operator of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.