My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 4:17:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 3:13:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 3
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Carol Oz <br /> August 26, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 8260 on all samples. Mr. Ross indicated that it would be difficult at this point to change the <br /> analytical program. You noted that if the analyses were not done now, SJCPHS/EHD might <br /> require further sampling and analyses at a later date. <br /> With regard to analysis of all samples utilizing EPA 8260, the Port of Stockton's work <br /> plans were developed with consideration of the data already collected at the sites as well as the <br /> age, removal dates, and contents of the tanks. On or about July 1998, we met with both you <br /> and Ms. Margaret Lagorio and discussed in detail each work plan for the site. No mention <br /> was made at that time.of any_,concerns regarding the analytical-program.—Addenda-.to the work ; <br /> plans were prepared, submitted, and approved by your office, and you were onsite during the <br /> field work as the samples were being prepared and the chains-of-custody filled out. Again, no <br /> mention was made of concerns with the analytical program. <br /> Our program was submitted in good faith and we believe that the program as presented <br /> is technically sound and will yield the information needed to make informed technical <br /> decisions on each site. As such, we intend to proceed with the analytical program that was <br /> detailed in the approved work plans for the site. <br /> In closing, I would like to emphasize that the Port would like to continue to partner {J <br /> with the SJCPHSIEHD in order to complete this project expeditiously. If you have any <br /> questions and or comments regarding this, please call me at (209) 946-0246 ext. 290. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ay R. angiri, M.S., REM, REA <br /> Director of Environmental and Regulatory Affairs <br /> CC: Mr. Phillip Ross, Boyajian and Ross <br /> Mr. Barry Nicholson, Environmental Specialist, Port of Stockton <br /> i <br /> j <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.