Laserfiche WebLink
•• Page 2 of 4 <br /> Legal Departments for their feedback and approval. <br /> I also need to be clear that while I understand you and AKF's frustration,you also need to understand our <br /> position as a very large company that is constantly being sued over ridiculous and innocent matters <br /> where Target has tried to do the right thing, but only gets its hand bitten in return. Also add in the fact <br /> that this store is located in arguably the most sue-happy state in the Union and you should understand <br /> our caution. <br /> I will do my best to get back to you within the next 24 hours. <br /> Tom <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, January 24, 20112:00 PM <br /> To: Tom.Dawson <br /> Subject: FW: Target Store T1526 Manteca, California (License Agreement) <br /> Tom, <br /> I just heard from AKF. <br /> AKF's insurance cost for one year at your levels of coverage will cost them $5,000. <br /> is this a point for compromise? <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:57 AM <br /> To: Tom.Dawson' <br /> Subject: RE: Target Store T1526 Manteca, California (License Agreement) <br /> Somewhere this project to remove one plastic casing has gotten slightly out of scale. <br /> is there NO room for compromise? modification of policy? I work for a County <br /> government and I make compromises all the time. I am constantly asked to 'put the <br /> concern in perspective.......is it possible for Target to look at this isolated incident/situation <br /> from a point of view that it truly deserves? please consider the request. <br /> The thirty minutes to set up on the City sidewalk and the thirty minutes it should take to <br /> remove the plastic casing and fill the hole that is six inches on Target property may not <br /> happen if Target insurance requirements remain fixed as you mention. <br /> WHat could result if the well does not get removed by AKF is that TARGET will then <br /> become responsible for the well, afterall, it is ON Target property and Target will remain <br /> the owner of the well and be responsible for it. According to our County Ordinance, wells <br /> must serve their intented purpose. In addtion to 'monitoring' Monitoring wells, they must <br /> be monitored and reported or removed/destroyed under permit. <br /> Monitoring well(s) that are not monitored are subject to San Joaquin County Well <br /> Ordinance (abandonment) violations. These could include formal legals actions if an <br /> agreement can't be reached. <br /> Please do what you can to express to Target insurance/policy officials that allowing AKF <br /> 1/24/2011 <br />