My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPRECKELS
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009289
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2020 2:54:20 PM
Creation date
5/13/2020 1:48:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009289
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004043
FACILITY_NAME
SPRECKLES BUSINESS PARK
STREET_NUMBER
18800
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SPRECKELS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
18800 S SPRECKELS RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> MONITORING REPORT COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST <br /> FOR <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> FOR <br /> DISCHARGES REGULATED BY TITLE 27 AND/OR SUBTITLE D PART 258 <br /> Dischar er(s): AKF Development, LLC Reporting Frequency: Semi-annual <br /> Facility Name: Spreckels Sugar Plant No. 2 Monitoring Period 2" & 3r Quarter 2006 <br /> Order No.: R5-2003-0024 <br /> Standard Provisions Date: 2000 Date Due: 31 January 2007 <br /> Facility No.: Date Received: 8 March 2007 <br /> RWQCB Reviewer: Ross Atkinson Date Reviewed: 28 March 2007 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> Standard 1. Transmittal Letter X <br /> Provisions <br /> (1993,1997,2000, a. Is there a transmittal letter signed <br /> 2003) by an authorized representative? <br /> b. Does it include the required X <br /> Certification Statement? <br /> c. Is there a discussion whether any X <br /> violations have occurred since the <br /> last monitoring report was <br /> submitted? <br /> d. If any violations did occur,does it X No new violations noted. The facility has a <br /> describe actions taken or planned well identified plume of salt contamination in <br /> for correcting those violations? groundwater,concentrations are slowly <br /> decreasing. <br /> Standard 2. Compliance Evaluation Summary X <br /> Provisions <br /> (1993,1997,2000, a. Map/Photo: is there a map or <br /> 2003) aerial photograph indicating the <br /> locations of all monitoring points? <br /> b. Standard Observations: Is there a X The sugar processing facility has removed the <br /> summary and certification of ponds and the site has been redeveloped. <br /> completion of all standard <br /> observations for the WMU,and <br /> for receiving waters? <br /> Sr. Initials CIWQS Violation#495826 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.