Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> 0 Winston H.Hickox Robert Schneider,Chair —0 <br /> Gray Davis <br /> Secretaryfor Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Environmental Intemet Address: http://w .sw b.ca.gov/–mgcb5 <br /> Protection 3443 Roufier Road,Suite A,Sacramento,California 95827-3003 <br /> Phone(916)255-3000•FAX(916)255-3015 <br /> 13 January 2003 I1�US v <br /> JAN <br /> 14 2003 <br /> Mr. E. Bingham Kirk ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> AKF Development LLC PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> 1132 Norman Drive <br /> Manteca, CA 95336 <br /> RESPONSE TO CO . TS TENTATIVE WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS, <br /> FORMER SIA GAMMMNT NOF: 2, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (CASE NO. 860) <br /> Regional Board staff has reviewed your comments on the Tentative Waste Discharge Requirements for <br /> Spreckels Sugar Plant No. 2 submitted on your behalf by Kleinfelder Inc. Staff's response to your <br /> comments and/or resulting changes to proposed Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) follow: <br /> Comment 1: Item No. 3 of the WDRs has been changed to read "The Former Spreckels Sugar Manteca <br /> Plant". <br /> Comment 2: Section A, Discharge Prohibitions, Item Nos. 1 and 2 prohibit discharge of hazardous and <br /> designated wastes respectively to any onsite pond. They are included to prohibit the discharge of these <br /> types of waste to any existing or new ponds without revised WDRs. No change has been made to the <br /> proposed WDRs. <br /> Comments 3 & 4: Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) Section 3. Monitoring Points, <br /> Groundwater, 2nd Paragraph has been revised to read in part: "Existing wells may be replaced with new <br /> wells constructed in the same manner and in a like hydrogeologic location with respect to the former <br /> lime ponds. Prior to replacement, a workplan must be submitted to the RWQCB which details the <br /> proposed abandonment of an existing and replacement well installation. All abandonment and <br /> installation shall also be in accordance with the San Joaquin County well ordinance." One reference in <br /> the MRP of the option to move wells as needed is sufficient. <br /> Comment 5: The concentration limit for Chloride was revised to 289 mg/1. This value corresponds to <br /> the value presented in Kleinfelder's revised table of Concentration Limits. <br /> Comment 6: MRP page 3, Item a has been deleted. <br /> Comment 7: The discharger may always petition the RWQCB for changes in their environmental <br /> monitoring program. No changes made to either the proposed WDRs or MRP. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Q,Recycled Paper <br />