Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment C:Data Usability Summary and Laboratory Analytical Reports <br /> • Representativeness <br /> • Completeness <br /> • Comparability <br /> DATA USABILITY SUMMARY <br /> The following sections summarize the findings of the data evaluation process. Immediately <br /> following is a summary of the data verification and validation qualifiers used in the data <br /> evaluation: <br /> ualifier Description <br /> E Indicates the reported value is estimated due to associated quality <br /> control (QC) results. <br /> J Indicates the reported value is an estimated concentration detected <br /> between the method detection limit (MDL) and limit of <br /> quantitation(LOQ). <br /> A summary of qualified data is provided in Table C-1. Data validation reason codes for all <br /> qualified data are also presented and defined on Table C-1. <br /> Precision and Accuracy <br /> The precision and accuracy of field and laboratory QC samples were evaluated. The calculated <br /> relative percent differences (RPDs) for field duplicate and matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate <br /> (MS/MSD)pairs provided information on the precision of sampling and analytical procedures, <br /> and the RPDs for laboratory control sample/laboratory control sample duplicate (LCS/LCSD) <br /> pairs provided information on the precision of the analytical procedures. Evaluation of the <br /> percent recoveries (%Rs) of MS/MSDs, LCS/LCSDs, and surrogates provided information on <br /> accuracy. <br /> MS/MSDs <br /> One MS/MSD pair was collected during the field sampling event. All %Rs and RPDs were <br /> within acceptance criteria. <br /> LCS/LCSDs <br /> An LCS was analyzed with each analytical batch of samples. All LCS/LCSD %Rs were within <br /> the laboratory control limits with the exception of pyrene, which was slightly above the upper <br /> QC range. Pyrene was flagged E in sample MW-9-090116. <br /> Surrogates <br /> Surrogate recoveries were evaluated for all methods. The laboratory used three surrogates in the <br /> analysis of PAHS: nitrobenzene-d5, 2-fluorbiphenyl, and terphenyl-d14. PAH surrogate <br /> nitrobenzene-d5 was above QC limits for MS/MSD soil samples. However, nitrobenzene-d5 is <br /> not associated with the target PAHS; it was used to evaluate the overall system performance and <br /> not to qualify sample results. Orthoterphenyl was used as the surrogate for the TPH analysis. <br /> All other surrogates were within range. <br />