My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
2245
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540822
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2021 3:30:30 PM
Creation date
5/13/2020 3:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0540822
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023389
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER HELENA CHEMICAL FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
2245
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16336017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2245 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONDOR EARTH <br />188 Frank West Circle, Suite 1 <br />Stockton, CA 95206 <br />209.234.0518 <br />Fax 209.234.0538 <br />w condorearth.com CONDOR <br />February 27, 2018 <br />Aimee Phiri, P.E. <br />Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />11020 Sun Center Drive # 200 <br />Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 <br />SUBJECT: Review Comments for Revised Site Investigation Work Plan, Former Helena Chemical <br />Facility, 2245 West Charter Way, Stockton, San Joaquin County <br />Condor Job No. 6847A <br />Dear Ms. Phiri: <br />Condor Earth (Condor) reviewed the December 15, 2017 letter, wherein the Central Valley Regional Water <br />Quality Control Board (Central Valley Water Board) provided comments to the October 19, 2017 Work <br />Plan for Additional Site Investigation, Former Helena Chemical Facility, 2245 West Charter Way, <br />Stockton, California (Work Plan). Condor provides responses (underlined, below) to each of the Central <br />Valley Water Board's comments. <br />RESPONSE TO COMMENTS <br />Central Valley Water Board staff concur with the proposed number and locations of step-out borings <br />(B-42 through B-46) in the area where I ,2,3-TCP was previously detected at an elevated level (12 <br />micrograms per liter [ug/L] in a groundwater sample from boring B39/GW12). Staff also concur with <br />the analyses proposed for soil and groundwater samples that will be collected from these proposed <br />borings. <br />Response: Based upon the non-detect results of Atrazines analyses in each of the Site monitoring wells, <br />Condor proposes to remove Atrazines from the analyte list, although groundwater samples collected <br />from newly installed wells would be analyzed for Atrazines during the first sampling event. <br />Analytical data for a groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-3 in May 2016 <br />(following installation of the well) indicated the presence of 1,2,3-TCP at a concentration of 0.0057 <br />ug/L (and 0.0063 ug/L in a duplicate sample). Groundwater monitoring data for MW-3 has <br />indicated the presence of low levels of 1,2,3-TCP (approximately 0.0022 ug/L in June 2017 and <br />0.0038 ug/L in September 2017). Based on these data, it is possible that MW-3 is located on the edge <br />of a 1,2,3-TCP plume that may be present around B39/GW12. Therefore, Central Valley Water <br />Board staff recommend that step-out borings be advanced near MW-3 to collect soil and <br />groundwater samples for analysis of 1,2,3-TCP. Additionally, at least one boring should be <br />advanced in the area between B39/GW12 and MW-3 to verifi, whether or not a I,2,3-TCP plume <br />exists in this area. <br />Response: Condor proposes a step-out boring northeast of well MW-3 (between MW-3 and <br />B39/GW12), and a step-out boring south-southeast of well MW-3 in the assumed downgradient <br />direction and next to the former hazardous chemical storage area. It should be noted that although the <br />gradient was calculated to the northwest in May 2016 and June 2017, groundwater in most other
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.