My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008816
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
26 (STATE ROUTE 26)
>
8203
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545707
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 8:48:27 AM
Creation date
5/13/2020 4:00:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008816
RECORD_ID
PR0545707
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003591
FACILITY_NAME
JOHN M RISHWAIN
STREET_NUMBER
8203
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 26
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215-9536
APN
10114021
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8203 E HWY 26
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 28 July 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0645 <br />' Page 2 of 3 <br />' analytical laboratory, in Paramount, California Each sample was analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel(TPH-g and TPH-d)by EPA <br />' Method 8015M, <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX)and the oxygenated fuel additives <br />' methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA),di-Isopropyl ether(DIPE), <br /> ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), ethyl-dibromide <br /> (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA)by EPA Method 8260 Modified <br /> 23 WELL HEAD SURVEY <br />' On 02 June 2004 a California state-licensed survey engineer from Baumbach & Piazza, Inc <br /> g <br />' surveyed the elevation at the top of the well casing(towc)and the location of vapor extraction wells <br /> VW-1 through VW-3, and re-surveyed monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 Elevations were <br /> surveyed to the nearest 0 01-foot relative to San Joaquin County Bench Mark # 21 3, surveyed at <br /> 1059 04 feet above mean sea level (MSL) Coordinate locations (x and y) of well locations were <br /> calculated to the nearest 0 1-foot using coordinate datum NAD 83 from global positioning satellite <br /> (GPS) observations The results of the well survey are reported in Table 1 The surveying report <br /> (Baumbach & Piazza, Inc ) is presented in Appendix C <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation and flow direction were determined from field data Hydrocarbon impact <br /> to ground water was inferred from laboratory analysis of the samples <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Depth to ground water at the site on 30 June 2004 ranged from 93 80 feet to 94 00 feet below the <br /> monitoring well casing tops The ground water elevation in each well was calculated from this data <br /> The ground water elevations ranged between 48 44 feet (MW-1r) and 48 57 feet (MW-3) below <br /> MSL Ground water decreased an average of 8 feet since the March 2004 monitoring event(Table 1) <br /> At the time of the June 2004 monitoring event, the ground water flow direction was inferred to be <br /> southwest at a gradient of approximately 0 002 ft/ft, the flow direction was similar to the last two <br /> sampling events Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.