My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008922
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
26 (STATE ROUTE 26)
>
8203
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545707
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 8:48:28 AM
Creation date
5/13/2020 4:04:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008922
RECORD_ID
PR0545707
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003591
FACILITY_NAME
JOHN M RISHWAIN
STREET_NUMBER
8203
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 26
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215-9536
APN
10114021
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8203 E HWY 26
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I19 December 2005 <br /> iAGE-NC Project No 99-0645 <br /> Page 6of8 <br /> I the pilot test versus the distance from the extraction well The effective radius of influence was <br /> determined by drawing a best-fit line though these data points to correlate distance to vacuum data <br /> At a vacuum potential of 0 10 Inches of water, the radius of influence is approximately 30 feet for <br /> I the lower screened well (V W 1 A) and radius of influence is approximately 40 feet for the upper <br /> screened well (V W 1 B), at an Induced vacuum potential of 1 0 Inches of water, the radius of <br /> Influence Is 20 feet for well V W 1 A and approximately 25 feet for well V W 1 B Furthermore, at a <br />' vacuum potential of 10 0 Inches of water,the radius of Influence is less than 10 feet Based upon an <br /> effective vacuum potential of 0 1 Inches of water, the calculated effective radius of influence at the <br /> site will be 30 feet up to almost 40 feet for the upper screened vapor well The majority of the <br /> residual Impacted soil would be collected within the 40-foot radius of Influence <br /> I3.0. SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> We]I V W 1 B had been piped directly to the soil vapor extraction(SVE)unit located within a fenced <br /> I enclosure on the north side of the site (Figure 2) using 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 <br /> polyvinylchloride(PVC)piping In-line,the SVE system consists of a 55-gallon moisture knockout <br /> vessel for moisture separation and to prevent water collection within the treatment media, three <br /> 300-pound(lb)carbon canisters, then a Fuji 5-horsepower,regenerative vacuum blower capable of <br /> drawing a maximum 110 cfm of vapor, and finally two 1,500-1b carbon vessels to adsorb <br /> hydrocarbon vapor from the subsurface The SVE unit was operated in accordance with San Joaquin <br />' Unified Air Pollution Control District(APCD)permit 5984-1,the permit was canceled in July 2005 <br /> The SVE unit was observed or maintained weekly and monitored monthly During each monitoring <br />' event, the flow rate of extracted soil-vapor (Influent) was measured using a totalizing-flow Blue <br /> White roto-meter Vacuum potential was measured at the 2-Inch Influent line by the Magnehellc <br /> vacuum gauge In addition,the organic vapor concentrations in the Influent stream(before entering <br />' the blower) and the effluent stream(after exiting the carbon unit) were measured using the organic <br /> vapor meter equipped with a photo-ionization detector(PID Thermo Environmental 590b, 10 0 eV, <br /> calibrated to isobutylene) A Magnehelic vacuum gauge was temporarily attached to the inlet of the <br />' blower to measure vacuum pressure exerted on the extraction well,and a cumulative flow meter was <br /> utilized downstream of the carbon canisters to monitor air flow Sampling ports were installed <br /> upstream of the knockout vessel and downstream of the 1,500-1b carbon vessels to recover influent <br /> and effluent SVE air flow samples used to monitor the efficiency of hydrocarbon removal, in <br /> addition,the influent and effluent streams were monitored routinely for the presence of organic vapor <br /> using a PID Influent vapor samples were collected from within a vacuum chamber directly Into <br /> Tedlar vapor bags, the effluent samples were collected directly out of the effluent stream Field <br /> measurements were recorded at regular Intervals and are summarized in Table 4, analytical results <br /> Iof SVE vapor samples are summarized in Table 5 The SVE system was operated between October <br /> • 2004 and July 2005,at which time the operation of the system was terminated due to lack of influent <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.