My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008925
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
26 (STATE ROUTE 26)
>
8203
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545707
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 8:48:28 AM
Creation date
5/13/2020 4:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008925
RECORD_ID
PR0545707
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003591
FACILITY_NAME
JOHN M RISHWAIN
STREET_NUMBER
8203
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 26
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215-9536
APN
10114021
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8203 E HWY 26
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
! 05 May 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0645 <br />! Page 2 of 6 <br />! 22 SOIL-VAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> The SVE system was observed or maintained weekly and monitored monthly During each <br />! monitoring event, the flow rate of extracted soil-vapor (influent) was measured using a totalizing- <br /> flow Blue White roto-meter Vacuum potential was measured at the 2-inch influent line by the <br /> magnehelic vacuum gauge In addition, the organic vapor concentrations in the Influent stream <br /> (before entering the blower) and the effluent stream (after exiting the carbon unit) were measured <br /> using the OVM A Magnehelic vacuum gauge was temporarily attached to the inlet of the blower to <br /> measure vacuum pressure exerted on the extraction well, and a cumulative flow meter was utilized <br />' downstream of the carbon canisters to monitor air flow Sampling ports were installed upstream of <br /> the knockout vessel and downstream of the 1,500-1b carbon vessels to recover influent and effluent <br /> SVE air flow samples used to monitor the efficiency of hydrocarbon removal, in addition, the <br /> influent and effluent streams were monitored routinely for the presence of organic vapor using an <br /> organic vapor meter(OVM)equipped with a photo-ionization detector(PID Thermo Environmental <br /> 580, 10 0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene) Field measurements,recorded at regular intervals between <br />' 17 December 2004 and 23 March 2005, are summarized in Table 1 <br /> • Influent and effluent soil-vapor samples were collected on 21 January, 16 February and 08 March <br /> I2005, an effluent soil-vapor sample was collected on 23 March 2005 The influent vapor samples <br /> were collected from within a vacuum chamber directly into Tedlar vapor bags,the effluent samples <br /> were collected directly out of the effluent stream The samples were labeled, placed in a cooler and <br /> transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories(CTEL) in Paramount, <br /> a State of California Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified analytical laboratories The soil- <br /> vapor samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8015 Modified and <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8020 <br /> 23 MONITORING WELL EVACUATION AND MONITORING <br /> On 25 January 2005,the water level in each of three monitoring wells was measured relative to the <br /> top of the well casing using a Solinst water level meter After water levels were measured, a <br /> dedicated, disposable plastic bailer was used to purge each well Four and one-half to five gallons <br /> (a minimum of three well volumes) of water were removed from the wells Temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity of the purged water were measured at one-and-one-half gallon Intervals using an <br /> • Oakton water analyzer during purging The values had generally stabilized by the end of the purging <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.