Laserfiche WebLink
2.0 READING THE PRG TABLE <br /> 2.1 General Considerations <br /> With the exceptions described below, PRGs are chemical concentrations that correspond to <br /> fixed levels of risk (i.e.either a one-in-one million [10'] cancer risk or a noncarcinogeni <br /> hazard quotient of one, whichever occurs at a lower concentration) in soil, air, and water. In <br /> most cases, where a substance causes both cancer and noncancer or systemic effects, the 10-4 <br /> cancer risk will result in a more stringent criteria and consequently this value is presented in <br /> the table. PRG concentrations based on cancer risk are indicated by "ca". PRG <br /> concentrations based on noncarcinogenic health threats are indicated by "ne". <br /> If the risk-based concentrations are to be used to screen sites, it is recommended that both <br /> cancer and noncancer-based PRGs be obtained even though the printed list contains only the <br /> more restrictive of the two values. To obtain additional values (e.g. noncancer PRGs for a <br /> carcinogenic substance), the user has the following options: <br /> • download an electronic copy of the PRG table from EPA Region 9's homepage <br /> at http://www.epa.gov/region 9/ <br /> > download the file (PRG96.zip) from California Regional Water Board's BBS at <br /> 510.286.0404 <br /> • use the equations presented in Section 4.0 to calculate additional PRG values <br /> It has come to my attention that some users have been multiplying the cancer PRG <br /> concentrations by 10 or 100 to set "action levels" for triggering remediation or to set less <br /> stringent cleanup levels for a specific site after considering non-risk-based factors such as <br /> (ambient levels, detection limits, or technological feasibility). This practice recognizes that <br /> there may be a range of values that may be "acceptable" for carcinogenic risk (EPA's cancer <br /> risk range is from 10` to 10''). However, this practice could lead one to overlook serious <br /> noncancer health threats and it is strongly recommended that the user consult with a <br /> toxicologist or Regional risk assessor before doing this. For carcinogens, I have indicated by <br /> asterisk ("ca") in the PRG table where the noncancer PRGs would be exceeded if the cancer <br /> value that is listed is multiplied by 100. Two stars ("ca**") indicate that the noncancer <br /> values would be exceeded if the cancer PRG were multiplied by 10. There is no range of <br /> "acceptable" noncarcinogenic "risk" so that under no circumstances should noncancer PRGs <br /> be multiplied by 10 or 100, when setting final cleanup criteria. <br /> In general, PRG concentrations in the table are risk-based but for soil there are two important <br /> exceptions: (1) for several volatile chemicals, PRGs are based on the soil saturation equation <br /> ("sat") and (2) for relatively less toxic inorganic and semivolatile contaminants, a non-risk <br /> based "ceiling limit" concentration is given as 10" mg/kg ("max"). PRG concentrations that <br /> are not risk-based (i.e. either "sat" or "max") should be segregated before screening multiple <br /> 4 <br />