Laserfiche WebLink
NO FURTHER ACTION REQUEST <br /> COLBERG BOAT WORKS <br /> JUNE 2002 <br /> The results of the investigation were documented in Apex's report titled Results of Subsurface <br /> Investigation dated August 21, 1997 Colberg has been monitored quarterly for petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon constituents in the groundwater since July 1997 In September 1998, Apex <br /> submitted a remediation plan entitled Workplan for Pilot Test and Feasibility Analysis for <br /> removal of hydrocarbons from groundwater An Addendum to Workplan for Pilot Testing and <br /> Feasibility Analysis was resubmitted in January 1999, Prior to acceptance of the remediation <br /> plan,the County requested a mass balance calculation to determine whether remediation was <br /> necessary In April 1999, Apex submitted a report entitled Mass Balance for Remaining TPH G <br /> Upon review of the report,the County determined that the extent of contamination had not been <br /> delineated east of MW-3 <br />� 11 <br /> Based on the response of the County,Apex submitted a Workplan far Additional Subsurface <br /> Investigation and Site Characterization dated June 9, 1999 On September 29, 1999,Apex <br /> personnel unplemented the Workplan and installed five geoprobes at the site to establish the <br /> extent of petroleum impacted groundwater east of monitoring well MW-3 The data obtained <br /> from the investigation was incorporated into a report entitled Estimated Mass of Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbon Constituents Remaining in Groundwater, and submitted to the County on February <br /> 8, 2000 <br /> . GHH assumed environmental consulting responsibility for the site in May 2000 The County <br /> responded to the February 2000 Apex report in February 2001 by requesting additional soil and <br /> groundwater investigation east of MW-3 and soil boring SB-21 as shown on Figure 2 In April <br /> 2001,GHH submitted an Additional Assessment Workplan proposing installation of 6 geoprobes <br /> to complete the investigation requested by the County,which the County approved in the same <br /> month On January 8, 2002 GHH installed the 6 geoprobes (SB-25 through SB-30),which are <br /> incorporated into the Site Conditions and Site Characterization sections of this report <br /> A bibliography of all reports completed to date are contained in Appendix B <br /> SITE CONDITIONS <br /> Geology <br /> Regionally,the property is located within the Central Valley province - a large elongated <br /> northwesterly trending trough containing a thick accumulation of sedimentary rocks ranging in <br /> age from Jurassic to recent The Central Valley is divided into the Sacramento and San Joaquin <br /> basins with the dividing point between the two at the Mokolumne River Stockton is located <br /> within the northern portion of the San Joaquin Basin The Stockton fault, a northeasterly- <br /> trending fault zone,which crosses the valley at roughly right angles Just south of Stockton, is the <br /> . only signaficant structural feature m the area <br /> 2 <br /> i` <br />