My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011487
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STOCKTON
>
401
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0535812
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 9:34:02 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 9:21:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011487
RECORD_ID
PR0535812
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0020626
FACILITY_NAME
COLBERG BOAT WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
401
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STOCKTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13546010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
401 N STOCKTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Third Quarter 1999 Ground-vrater Monitoring Report <br /> Colberg Boat Works,401 North Stockton Street, Stockton,California <br /> Page 2 <br /> findings are summarized in their report, Phase I Preliminary Hazardous Materials Site <br /> Assessment, dated July 21, 1993 <br /> On December 12 and 13, 1994, Apex supervised the advancement of 11 subsurface probes to <br /> collect soil and groundwater samples at the site The results of the subsurface investigation are <br /> summarized in the report, Phrase II Site Assessment <br /> areas asr�oundepoi t, datethe faamer USTsJanuary 3, 195 The were9 impacted by of the subsurface investigation indicated <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> Subsequently, Colberg Boat Works was directed by the San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> Health Division (SJCEHD) to perform further investigations at the site Apex proposed <br /> additional subsurface investigation and groundwater monitoring installation at the site The <br /> proposed work was documented by Apex in Workplan foi Limited Subs tiface Investigation and <br /> Workplan Addendum for Limited Subsurface Investigation, dated May 2, 1995 and January 24, <br /> 1997, respectively <br /> On July 28, 1997, Apex personnel supervised the drilling of six soil borings, and converting the <br /> borings into six groundwater monitoring wells (Figure 2, MW-1 through MW-6) at the site The <br /> . results of the work were documented by Apex in Results of Subsurface Investigation, dated <br /> August 21, 1997 <br /> ich is on <br /> In April 1998, Apex submitted a cloareaure request for the former cont nu ng analyses foriesel tank location, hoxygenate <br /> the west side of the subject site and also recommended lis <br /> constituents with the exception of MTBE in wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 Apex further <br /> recommended discontinuing analyses for TPHd in wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 <br /> Apex submitted reports titled Work Plan for Pilot Test and Feasibility Analysis and Addendum to <br /> Work Plan For Pilot Testing and Feasibility Analysis, dated September 28, 1998 and January 20, <br /> 1999, respectively to SJCEHD These reports proposed the application of oxygen release <br /> compound (ORC)to MW-3 <br /> Before Apex was allowed to proceed with the ORC injection, SJCEHD requested that a mass <br /> balance be completed for the remaining TPHg constituents On April 2, 1999, Apex submitted <br /> the report titled Mass Balance for Remaining TPHg, which estimated the remaining mass of <br /> TPHg in the soil and groundwater at the Site <br /> Based on the results of the mass balance calculations contained in the Apex Mass Balance for <br /> Remaining TPHg report dated April 2, ld9m� SJCEHD <br /> Plardnot i For Prprove the Work lot Testing and Feasibility lot <br /> Test and Feasibility Analysis and Addendum <br /> Analysis, dated September 28, 1998 and January 20, 1999, respectively SJCEHD also stated <br /> that Central Valley Regional Water Quality <br /> not concur oncurtrol Board with a closure equestaff had SJCEHD requested <br /> ted on <br /> April 9, 1999 that the CVRWQCB would <br /> JJ D 1PR0JECTS\C'S\C0L0I 00t-COLBERG B04T WoRkS�QN[R0799\Q%IRTE`{T DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.