Laserfiche WebLink
A S S O C I A T E S I N C , <br /> 3.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION PILOT TEST <br /> A vapor extraction pilot test was proposed in ATC's Workplan for Vapor Extraction Pilot Testing <br /> at Former Greer Property, 15634 Steinegul Road, Escalon, California, dated June 18, 2 <br /> 003. <br /> - The purpose of this test was to evaluate vapor extraction as a viable remedial option for impacted <br /> soil and groundwater at the site and to collect data to design a vapor extraction system. <br /> { 3_1 Vapor Extraction Test Methods and Procedures <br /> i , <br /> On September 18 and 29, 2003, ATC performed ashort-term vapor extraction test and a long- <br /> term vapor extraction test, respectively. On the first day, a short-term vapor extraction test was <br /> performed by ATC using vapor well VE2 as the vapor extraction point while monitoring vacuum <br /> response in surrounding wells VE1, VE3, MWI, MW2, MW3, MW4, MW5, MW6, MW8, and <br /> MW9 (Figure 2). The test was approximately 3 hours and 45 minutes in length. Flowrates, <br /> 1, applied vacuums, influent and effluent VOC concentrations, and temperatures were also <br /> monitored during the test. Vapors were extracted using 3 HP Rotron Blower equipped with a <br /> ' moisture knockout chamber and three granular activated carbon (GAC) canisters. Two influent <br /> t , vapor samples were collected during the test, one after 15 minutes of operation, and one after 3 <br /> hours and 45 minutes of operation. An effluent vapor sample was collected after 15 minutes of <br /> operation. All vapor samples were collected into vacuum canisters. Samples were submitted <br /> under chain-of-custody to SunStar Laboratories (FLAP #2250) and analyzed for TPHg, BTEX; <br /> MTBE, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB), ethyl tert-butly ether (ETBE), <br /> di-isopropyl ether (RIPE), tert-butly alcohol (TBA), and tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) by EPA <br /> Method TO-14. <br /> On the second day, a long-term vapor extraction test was performed by ATC using vapor well <br /> VE3 as the vapor extraction point while monitoring vacuum response in surrounding wells VE I, <br /> VE2, MW1, MW2, MW3, MW4, MW5, MW6, MW8, and MW9 (Figure 2). The test was <br /> approximately 5 hours in length. Flowrates, applied vacuums, influent and effluent VOC <br /> ` concentrations, and temperatures were also monitored during the test. Vapors were extracted <br /> using an 3 HP Rotron Blower equipped with a moisture knockout chamber and three granular <br /> activated carbon (GAC) canisters. Two influent vapor samples were collected during the test, <br /> one after 15 minutes of operation, and one after 5 hours of operation. An effluent vapor sample <br /> was collected after 20 minutes of operation. Samples were submitted under chain-of-custody to <br /> j SunStar Laboratories (ELAP #2250) and analyzed for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE, 1,2-DCA, <br /> EDB,ETBE, DIPE, TBA, and TAME by EPA Method TO-14. <br /> 3_2 Vapor Extraction Test Results <br /> 1 Results and field readings from the short-term and long-term vapor extraction tests performed on <br /> September 18 and 29, 2003 are summarized in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. Copies of field <br /> notes are contained in Appendix A. Copies of laboratory reports are contained in Appendix B. <br /> S:\Enviromental\25291treportstrifs.doe 3 <br /> t <br />