My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STEINEGUL
>
15634
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0540821
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 10:11:34 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 10:09:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0540821
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023401
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER GREER CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
15634
STREET_NAME
STEINEGUL
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
15634 STEINEGUL RD
P_LOCATION
06
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(1 <br /> 1 <br /> %TC <br /> J , <br /> Laboratory results of the effluent vapor sample indicated destruction efficiency during the long- <br /> term test of approximately 92 percent for TPHg, approximately 98 percent for benzene, <br /> approximately 99 percent for toluene, and approximately 99 percent for ethylbenzene. <br /> C 4.0 DISCUSSION <br /> The soil vapor extraction pilot test yielded a radius of influence (ROI) of approximately 55 feet <br /> in well VE3. As shown in Section 3.2, approximately 7.0 pounds of TPHg were removed during <br /> the long term vapor extraction pilot test. During the long-tern vapor extraction test on well VE3, <br /> the vapor extraction rate appeared to equilibrate at approximately 62 cfm with a vacuum of <br /> t ' approximately 42 inches of water. Soil vapor extraction appears to be a viable method for <br /> remediating TPHg and BTEX impacted soil at the site. In ATC's experience, soil vapor <br /> extraction is also a moderately effective method for remediating TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE <br /> ' impacted groundwater. Soil vapor extraction is ineffective in preventing off-site migration of the <br /> r : impacted groundwater plume but this does not appear to be a concern at this time. <br /> ! 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 3 : <br /> It is ATC's opinion that vapor extraction is a viable remedial option for remediating impacted <br /> • soil at the site and ATC recommends enhancing soil vapor extraction with another alternative <br /> such as air sparging or groundwater extraction and treatment. If SJCEHD agrees with this <br /> recommendation, ATC will prepare an Interim Remediation Plan (IRP). ATC has recently <br /> submitted a workplan to SJCEHD to evaluate the vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> 1 ' impacted soil and groundwater. Once the vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil <br /> and groundwater has been defined, ATC will submit a Final Remediation Plan (FRP). ATC will <br /> monitor wells MW 1 through MW 10 quarterly. <br /> t ' <br /> qi <br /> 878 ' <br /> IL <br /> �d <br /> f <br /> t <br /> a <br /> SAEnviromental\2529 Breports\rifs.doc 5 <br /> rr <br /> C.+ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.