My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE (2)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 11:15:09 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 10:55:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br /> 1 <br /> 3 <br /> November 12, 1997 : <br /> TO: Annabel Mackey Fola.— <br /> FROM: Ron Markle <br /> SUBJECT: Claim No. 12107(Durhim Ali) <br /> J <br /> Comments: /�� Lttltol, <br /> 1. Claimant failed to complete pages4, 5,9,and 10oftheclaima .?1 would have made <br /> him do a more complete application. I assume thatyou were comfortabclaimant was both the <br /> owner and operator of the tanks at the time of discovery of the release in 1991,that he was exempt from <br /> the financial responsibility requirement because the tanks were removed prior to the 12/31/93 compliance <br /> date and were not mp]acsd2ff, Ince th�claimant didn't certify the tanks were not replaced,do we know? <br /> When you accept a claim application thaVis not complete,please include some notes on how you satisfied <br /> yourself that the information requested was not necessary for your review and that the eligibility <br /> requirements have been met(see my scribble notes). <br /> 2. It appears that the claimant never permitted the tanks. Your letter of January 10, 1997 requested <br /> additional information including information regarding the permit issue. Your letter of February 11, 1997 <br /> accepted the claim but apparently without a response to your January 10, 1997 letter. On October 29, <br /> 1997,you advised the claimant that he never permitted the tanks and needed M request a waiver of the <br /> eligibility requirement if eligible for the waiver. I don't see any response from the claimant. I don't want <br /> to process the LOC unless die claimant requests the wavier,is eligible for the waiver,and knows that he is <br /> subject to the 310,000 deductible. <br /> 206 698'ON aN(13 dnNti3-13 isn 6£:80 86/92/20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.