My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008332
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> f Hiller(1991)reviewed a number of full-scale SVE case histones and selected for analysis six well- <br /> documented successfully vented sites with TCE and/or PCE contamination which vaned somewhat in <br /> geologic setting and initial contammnant concentrations Vent gas PCFJTCE concentrations followed <br /> similar trends at the six sites,with an initial steep 80 to 90 percent decline lasting about 20 days, followed <br /> by a gradual asymptotic decrease to background concentrations During this latter phase,concentrations <br /> were similar among sites,falling from 20 ppm or less to about 2 ppm in the final stages after 6 months <br /> The data are shown in Figure 9-1 This was interpreted to reflect initial rapid evaporation of free product <br /> droplets, followed by a diffusion-controlled process of partitioning of contaminants previously dissolved in <br /> soil moisture into the gaseous phase and desorption from soil particles However,sharp declines in <br /> extracted vapor concentrations do not always indicate that advectmve removal has ended If only aggregate <br /> vapor concentrations are monitored(m e , from a common header),then the behavior of each well is masked <br /> Areas that contain high concentrations,but yield low air flowrates may be obscured by wells that yield <br /> higher flow rates This emphasizes the importance of monitoring individual wells <br /> ,aaa <br /> �d <br /> sflo <br /> s <br /> "400 <br /> n <br /> 0 <br /> 200 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 24 40 90 80 100 120 149 <br /> 3RE9 Er.ps.d Tim.(O.ya) <br /> A <br /> B <br /> G <br /> o <br /> E p <br /> F + <br /> Figure 9-1 Vent Gas VOC Concentrations at Six Sites Over Time <br /> 9-5 Evaluation of Results <br /> a Methods of evaluation for shutdown The results of the sampling and analyses described above <br /> must be carefully evaluated before deciding that the system is ready to be shutdown Typically,the criteria <br /> for determining when the system can be shut down include one or more of the following <br /> • Total amount of contammmant removed <br /> • Residual soil concentrations <br /> • Extraction well(s)vapor concentrations and composition <br /> • <br /> Soil gas contaminant concentrations and composition in monitoring points <br /> • <br /> 9-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.