My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008332
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> Appendix F <br /> Overview of Rebound Test Procedures and Data Evaluation <br /> F-1 Introduction <br /> a Purpose <br /> This appendix lays out a theoretical and practical framework for the collection and evaluation of data <br /> during rebound testing As mentioned in Section 9-9, rebound tests (also known as "pulsing tests")are <br /> commonly used to assess the attainment of cleanup in the vadose zone However, little tnformatton is <br /> available to guide field practitioners through the data collection and its interpretation (Holbrook et al , <br /> 1998) The objective of this appendix is to fill this void by providing a step-by-step approach to planning <br /> and performing a rebound test along with straightforward mathematical techniques for evaluating the <br /> data to determine adequacy of cleanup The material presented in this appendix is intended to be an <br /> introduction to rebound testing and serves as a practical starting point for further development of this <br /> important procedure <br /> b Background <br /> The intent of rebound testing is to assess residual contamination remaining in soils after a penod of <br /> active remediation The underlying premise is that soils are inherently heterogeneous and may often be <br /> divided into two relative categories low permeability and high permeability During soil vapor <br /> extraction, vapors flow predominantly in the high permeability soils intersected by extraction wells and <br /> contaminant removal is primarily from these soils This extraction creates a difference,or gradient, in <br /> the concentration between more permeable and less permeable soils Contaminants residing in the less <br /> permeable soils are removed only after migrating into more permeable soils where soil vapors are <br /> flowing(DiGiulio et al , 1998) The migration occurs primarily by vaporous diffusion into active flow <br /> paths caused by the concentration gradient Similar contaminant transport occurs during bioventing <br /> During a period of rebound(i e ,no extraction or infection), the soil vapors are relatively dormant and <br /> contaminant concentrations equilibrate between phases and soil types In other words,the air is not <br /> moving and contaminant vapors diffuse from lesser to more permeable soils and the vapor concentration <br /> in the more permeable soils approaches that of the low permeability soils The vapor concentration in <br /> the more permeable soils can be measured periodically in the extraction wells to track the progress of <br /> rebound Hence,the goal of a rebound test is to measure the concentration remaining in the least <br /> permeable soils by allowing equilibration of contaminant vapors among all soil types at a site A <br /> measure of the concentration in less permeable soils is a strong indicator of the residual contamination at <br /> the site <br /> C Introductory Example <br /> Consider an SVE site with a single extraction well in the middle of a vapor plume within which no <br /> NAPL exists Assume a uniform extraction rate has been drawn from the well since the initiation of <br /> operation except for two periods of dormancy Measurements of the vapor concentration within the <br /> extraction well are illustrated in Figure F-1 <br /> F-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.