My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008332
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> Several rounds of vapor sampling should be performed at normal intervals (e g ,monthly)to define the <br /> slow decay in the existing extraction configuration <br /> After several rounds of sampling yield consistent decay curves, the rebound test may be initiated This <br /> phase begins by collecting a final round of vapor samples along with measurements of total <br /> concentration using field portable instruments such as a PID or FID,as appropriate After collecting the <br /> samples and measurements,the extraction wells are closed and the extraction pumps are turned off Care <br /> should be taken to minimize the flow of atmospheric air through the wells and into the subsurface All <br /> extraction wells and monitoring points should be capped The site should then be left undisturbed except <br /> for vapor sampling as specified in the Work Plan Vapor sampling during the dormant period is best <br /> performed with a small sampling pump, if possible The well being sampled should be purged by <br /> extracting a volume equivalent to at least three volumes of the well casing and screen In addition,a <br /> field portable PID or FID should be used to monitor the extracted vapors to ensure a relatively steady <br /> concentration has been reached before the vapor sample for detailed analysis is collected If the vapor <br /> sampling during the dormant period yields a clear trend to an equilibrium concentration, the system may <br /> be re-started In past practice it was common to allow the rebound period to be "long" to ensure the site <br /> re-equilibrated before re-starting extraction No samples were collected during the rebound period since <br /> the only parameter of interest was the equilibrated concentration However, without sampling during the <br /> rebound period,no data will exist to demonstrate re-equilibration and a valuable assessment of the mass <br /> transfer rate between mobile and immobile soils is lost <br /> The final period of the rebound test is the system re-start Just prior to starting the extraction system, a <br /> round of vapor sampling should be performed to define the endpoint of the rebound The re-start of <br /> extraction should be in the same configuration and at the same rates as the steady period leading up to <br /> the rebound period With the same configuration, the extraction well vapor concentrations before and <br /> after the rebound period are directly comparable Vapor sampling during the period immediately <br /> following the re-start is critical The maximum rebound concentration may or may not appear at the <br /> extraction wells immediately after re-start Recall the previous discussion on the distribution of <br /> contaminants If the extraction wells are not located in the middle of the contaminant mass, the <br /> concentration may rise for a short period before the decay associated with the sweep of the mobile soils <br /> begins Therefore, the extracted vapors should be monitored with a field portable PID or FID during the <br /> initial hours of extraction A vapor sample should be collected for analyses at or just after a peak is <br /> observed If the initial concentration is the maximum and decay begins immediately, then the final <br /> rebound sample is representative of the initial extracted concentration The goal of the vapor sampling <br /> during the re-start is to define the decay trend associated with the sweep of the mobile soils and the <br /> subsequent slower decay as the removal becomes diffusion limited It is expected that the diffusion- <br /> limited trend will return to the decay rate observed just before the rebound period <br /> F-5 Data Evaluation <br /> As described in Section F-2, analyses of the early and late concentration trends can yield estimates for <br /> the total contaminated volume and the field mass transfer coefficient However, the objectives of a <br /> rebound test are to assess the mass of residual contamination and concentrations within low permeability <br /> materials This section presents mathematical relationships to estimate the residual contaminant mass at <br /> a site using the data from a rebound test Measures of vapor concentrations in the low permeability soils <br /> come directly from the rebound data The mathematical analysis assumes the following data are <br /> available after following the field procedures described in the previous section, <br /> F-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.