Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> go30 FIELD SERVICES AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS <br /> Geocon performed groundwater monitoring and sampling on April 6, 2005, to determine water table <br /> elevation and the distribution of dissolved hydrocarbons in groundwater monitoring wells Three <br /> offsite domestic wells were sampled to determine if potable water supplied to adjacent residents are <br /> rimpacted with petroleum hydrocarbons Groundwater elevation data and contaminant concentrations <br /> in groundwater are reported in Table 1 <br /> rOperation and maintenance (O&M) services were performed for the SVE and ozone sparge systems <br /> for the reporting period of February 2, 2005 to April 25, 2005 <br />' <br /> 31 Water Table Elevation and Gradient <br />' On April 6, 2005, Geocon personnel measured the depth to water in each of the eleven Site-related <br /> groundwater monitoring wells A water level indicator was used to gauge the wells to the nearest 0 01 <br /> foot The elevation data indicates the groundwater gradient for each quarter was generally towards the <br /> south at 0 002 ft/ft as depicted in the Elevation Contour Map, Figure 4 Groundwater monitoring data <br /> are presented in Table 1 <br />' <br /> 32 Quarterly Groundwater Sampling <br /> 9 <br /> Groundwater monitoring wells were purged using a submersible pump or a disposable bailer until <br /> pH, temperature, and conductivity readings had stabilized Temperature, conductivity, and pH <br /> r readings were recorded for each well for each casing volume removed Water purged from the wells <br /> is stored temporarily in a 500-gallon above ground storage tank within the treatment system <br />' compound This tank is periodically purged and the contents transported off site for proper disposal <br /> Adequate recovery was observed in the purged groundwater monitoring wells prior to sampling A <br /> disposable bailer was used to collect the groundwater samples All samples were decanted from the <br /> bailer into the appropriate containers, preserved with ice, and transported under chain-of-custody <br /> r protocol to Advanced Technology Laboratory (ATL) in Signal Hill, California for the organic <br /> chemical analysis The water samples were analyzed for TPHg following EPA Method 8015, and <br /> BTEX and FOCs following EPA Method 8260 <br />' Domestic wells DW-2R> DW-3 and DW-4 were purged by opening a spigot at the well head works <br />' draining the well's holding tank, and allowing the tank to re-fill with fresh water pumped from the <br /> aquifer Once the tank had been recharged, water samples were collected directly from a spigot at the <br /> holding tank Domestic wells DW-2R, DW-3, and DW-4 are on a quarterly sampling schedule <br /> 1 <br /> • <br /> 1 <br /> Project No 58643-06-01 -5- May 5 2005 <br /> r <br />