My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008360
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008360
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 11:48:48 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:23:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008360
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final Remediation Plan Page 10 <br /> Ranch Market 23569 South Santa Fe Road Riverbank CA February 28 2001 <br /> • Given the general assumptions used, the total estimated mass of hydrocarbons in the soil and <br /> groundwater at the site could vary by as much as +or— 50% <br /> 5.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> 5.1 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Goals <br /> Soil and groundwater cleanup levels for the Site will be determined by site-specific risk based <br /> evaluation in conjunction with beneficial use analysis The objective of the remediation will <br /> be removal and/or in-situ destruction of hydrocarbons adsorbed to soil and dissolved in <br /> groundwater to concentrations below risk-based levels <br /> 5.2 Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives <br /> The following Technologies to remediate petroleum hydrocarbons adsorbed to soil and <br /> dissolved in groundwater at the Site were evaluated <br /> • Soil Excavation, <br /> • Passive Biodegradation with long term groundwater monitoring, <br /> • In-situ Biologic and/or Chemical Treatment, <br /> • Soil Vapor Extraction combined with Air Sparging (SVE/AS), <br /> . • Soil Vapor Extraction combined with Ozone Sparging (SVE/OS), and <br /> • SVE/AS combined with Groundwater Extraction and Treatment (GET) <br /> Due to the depth to water and high formation permeability, cost estimates for Dual Phase <br /> Extraction and Water Treatment (DPET) were not prepared A remediation feasibility matrix <br /> summarizing the estimated cost of each remedial option has been included in Appendix C <br /> Based upon the distribution of gasoline in the soil and groundwater, the lithology, and depth <br /> to groundwater, SECOR eliminated most of the considered alternatives <br /> 5.2.1 Soil Excavation <br /> Removal of the impacted soil by excavation was eliminated due to the impracticality of <br /> excavating to depths in excess of the 30 feet In addition, soil excavation will not remove or <br /> degrade the gasoline dissolved in groundwater, <br /> 5.2.2 Passive Biodegradation <br /> Passive biodegradation does not address migration of dissolved MtBE or the gasoline <br /> adsorbed to soil in the vadose zone The cost estimate presented in Table 1 assumes 20 years <br /> of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling SECOR does not recommend this <br /> remedial approach <br /> File FRP-report doc SFCOR International Incorporated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.