Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Boring and Monitoring Well Installation Report Page 3 <br /> Ranch Market Riverbank CA September 6 2000 <br /> • of each soil sample The drill cuttings were placed on visqueen, and stored at the Site pending <br /> characterization and removal The auger steam cleaning water was retained and stored in 55- <br /> gallon drums pending offsite disposal <br /> 4.2 Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were collected from the 4 GeoprobeTM borings and from SB-1, S13-2, MW-6, <br /> MW-8, and MW-9 at 5-foot intervals, beginning at 5 feet bgs to total depth Samples were <br /> collected from the GeoprobeTM borings using a lined 18-inch long, 1-inch O D direct-push <br /> sampler Samples were collected from the HSA borings using a 2 5-inch O D split-spoon <br /> sampler, lined with three 2-inch-diameter by 6-inch-long brass sample tubes The split-spoon <br /> sampler was driven 18 inches ahead of the augers at each sample point At the continuous <br /> core borings (SB-1 and SB-2) samples were collected into 2-inch-diameter by 6-inch-long <br /> brass sleeves directly from the continuous core barrel The continuous core barrel was pushed <br /> approximately 6-inches ahead of the augers during drilling at five foot increments Selected <br /> soil samples were field screened for hydrocarbon vapors using a PID Soil was logged using <br /> the Unified Soil Classification System by a SECOR field geologist working under the <br /> supervision of a California registered geologist (Appendix B) One four point composite soil <br /> sample was collected from the stockpiled drill cuttings in 2-inch-diameter by 6-inch-long <br /> brass sample tubes for use in profiling the soil for offsite disposal A copy of the field notes <br /> have been included in Appendix C <br /> . Selected samples were sealed, labeled and placed on ice in an insulated container for transport <br /> under chain-of-custody manifest to Kiff Analytical LLC, a California state-certified analytical <br /> laboratory located in Davis, CA <br /> Soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis were chosen on the basis of PID readings, <br /> hthology, historical analytical results, and depth to groundwater observed in each boring <br /> Selected samples were analyzed using U S Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) method <br /> 8260B for BTEX, TPHg, and MtBE Refer to Table 4 for a summary of samples submitted <br /> for analysis by boring location <br /> 4.3 Lithology <br /> Based on the description of the soil samples collected from the soil borings, the lithology at <br /> the Site consists mainly of sands and silts with varying degrees of gravel in the upper 75 feet <br /> bgs The hthology generally coarsens downward from sandy silt towards the groundwater <br /> surface to gravelly sand found at depth Figures 4, 5, and 6 show the layout of the two <br /> geologic cross-sections through the Site, geologic cross-section A to A', and geologic cross- <br /> section B to B', respectively No obvious low permeability confining layer of clay or silty <br /> clay were observed the two continuous cores collected from soil bonngs SB-1 and SB-2 <br /> Boring logs of all thirteen bonngs drilled during this assessment and boring logs from <br /> previously drilled MW-1 through MW-4 are included in Appendix B <br /> i <br /> File R-Wellinstall&M&S rpt doe SECOR International Incorporated <br />