My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012626
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
145
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543041
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:03:14 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 2:45:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012626
RECORD_ID
PR0543041
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024604
FACILITY_NAME
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
145
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14912016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
145 S SUTTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L7ydF+ C n <br /> W� <br /> The previously mentioned trigger cleanup level of 0.3 ug/L is the <br /> initial level established for the preliminary stage of the site <br /> evaluation. At the present time, there are no specific action 1 <br /> i levels or other criteria for determining the allowable hydrocar- <br /> bon concentrations which may remain in place in the soils. The <br /> cleanup levels are determined on a case by case scenario based on 47 <br /> specific site characteristics. As a general guideline, the. San <br /> ' Joaquin Local Health District recommends 100 mg/kg of TPH as a r <br /> cleanup level, as well as the other associated chemical concen- <br /> trations listed on Table 1. These levels supersede the initial <br /> trigger leve]• and can be assumed to be the designated cleanup <br /> levels. <br /> 4.2 water Samples <br /> Three shallow groundwater wells, Mw-1, MW-2 and MW-3, were in- <br /> stalled at the site; located as shown on Figure 3 and water <br /> - samples were collected using a clear teflon bailer. The <br /> specifics of the groundwater sampling effort are described in <br /> detail in the Field Sampling Report contained in Appendix A. <br /> ._. The analytical results of the groundwater samples are summarized <br /> in Table 3. These results reveal significant concentrations of <br /> BTX&E compounds and TPH in the water sample collected from <br /> monitoring well MW-2. BTX&E compounds were detected only in low <br /> concentrations in monitoring well MW-3. No organic compounds <br /> analyzed for were detected n the water sample from MW-1. No <br /> ,._ floating product was observed in any of the monitoring wells. <br /> For dissolved product, such as was detected in wells MW-2 and <br /> NW-3, the Department of health Services (DHS) has established <br /> action levels for drinking water. These levels are: <br /> o Benzene 0.7 ug/L <br /> o Xylene 620 ug/L <br /> o Toluene 140 ug/L <br /> o Ethylbenzene 680 ug/L <br /> A review of Table 3 indicates the chemical concentrations present <br /> in monitoring well MW-3 exceed all of these limits while in well ° <br /> Mw-3 only the benzene concentration exceeds the action levels <br /> ` Even though the DHS action levels for drinking water are exceed- . <br /> ed, it is unlikely that the shallow zone can be classified as a <br /> "source of drinking water" as specified by the State Water <br /> Resources Control Board's Resolution No. 38-63. The Resolution <br /> specifies that a water source which does not provide sufficient <br /> water to supply a single well capable of producing an average <br /> per day (gpd} shall not be <br /> sustained yield of 200 gallons <br /> considered or suitable for municipal or domestic water supply. <br /> Based on WESTON's observations during the prasampling collection <br /> purge of the wells (re: Field Sampling Report, Section 3.3, <br /> Appendix A) , it is not expected the shallow aquifer can sustain <br /> I ' the minimum 200 gpd yield. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.