My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012626
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
145
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543041
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:03:14 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 2:45:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012626
RECORD_ID
PR0543041
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024604
FACILITY_NAME
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
145
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14912016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
145 S SUTTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> t lfexhi ite� significant drawdown <br /> was measured by the observed volumely by withinathenbaris Bn) <br /> rawd <br /> this information the wells appear to have limited <br /> bailer. asedoon <br /> p.. <br /> I : capacities. At this point samples were again collected from <br /> well water (for aromatic volatile organics) . The water collected <br /> the <br /> in the bailer was poured directly into two cleaned, kilned 40 <br /> milliliter (ml), amber glass vials preserved with 2 ml of 1:1 <br /> dilutes hydrochloric acid and caped rteflon <br /> The bailer was decontaminatedbet een wells lined etc <br /> techniques as described for the split analytical sampling.using the spa-spoonme <br /> Using the depth to water and total well depth measurement, the <br /> volume of standing water in the well and the re <br /> volumes were calculated and recorded on a standardizedired wellpsam� <br /> pling log sheet. <br /> Total Depth to 3 Purge Well a th Water g <br /> Volum?sVolume <br /> MWX 30.6' 25.97, 9.1 gal 9.25gal <br /> 3 30.38 37.89, 21. 4 gal 0 al <br /> 28.78 3.1 gal 3.25 gal <br /> Note: The EPA 602 sample from MW2 was taken <br /> prior <br /> 3 purge volumes, Due to the sample contain r abeing <br /> preserved, emptying and resampling was not possible. <br /> In the last moments of well purging, the pH, temperature, and <br /> conductivity measurements were recorded. This information is as <br /> follows: <br /> Well Conductivity <br /> pH <br /> micromhos <br /> Mwl 7.3 <br /> MW2 7.3 1190 <br /> 1855 <br /> MW3 <br /> 7.6 <br /> 2300 <br /> A record of the purging activi-ies, including the volume of water <br /> purged, was maintained in the field log book and on the <br /> log sheet (enclosed) . sample <br /> All water samples were labeled in the field with an indelible ink <br /> pen as they were collected. For each sample, the date and time <br /> �. of sample collection, the sampler's initials, the project name <br /> and the designated analyses were recorded on the label and on the <br /> sampling log sheet. Water samples were identified using the <br /> monitor well name. once labeled, the samples were inserted into <br /> b' ziplock baggies and - <br /> samples, with a Placed on ice in an insulated cooler. A11 <br /> appropriate-chain of custody forms, were delivered <br /> to the laboratory the same day as sampled. The samples were to <br /> be analyzed for the same analytical <br /> samlpes collected. Parameters as for the soil <br /> i <br /> E - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.