My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010355
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
145
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543041
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:35:33 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 2:51:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010355
RECORD_ID
PR0543041
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024604
FACILITY_NAME
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
145
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14912016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
145 S SUTTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> R <br /> YivuoEH! eESn,Eo9.M utilN 9 <br /> ROY F. WESTON, INC. <br /> STOCKTON ANALYTICAL LABORATORY <br /> ANALYTICAL CASE NARRATIVE <br /> Client SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> RFW # 9306SO33 <br /> IFUMIGANTS <br /> 1 This narrative covers the analysis of 5 samples in accordance with protocols based <br /> on EPA Method 504. <br /> I2 The holding tunes for this analysis were met. <br /> 3. Calibration criteria is required to be met on at least one column for each target <br /> compound, and on both columns for any compound reported positive. Initial and <br /> continuing calibration criteria were met for this analysis. <br /> 4 The method blank associated with these samples did not contain any target <br /> compounds at or above the reporting limits <br />' 5. Surrogate recoveries were within advisory limits. <br /> 6 The recoveries for the blank spike were within advisory limnts. <br /> 7 The recovery for the matrix spike was not within advisory limas (35%). <br />' 8 Confirmation by second column analysis was not required because no target <br /> compounds were detected in the samples. Sample MW4 was analyzed in <br /> duplicate, but a RPD could not be calculated because no target compounds <br />' were detected in this sample. A diluted analysis of sample MW-8 was <br /> required because of the presence of background matrix peaks. <br /> Dale E. Gimble/Unit Leader Date <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.