Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 6.0 <br /> COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> iAlternative l would remediate the plume in the shortest period but is the most expensive. This <br /> alternative is the hardest to implement and would cause significant disruption of the local traffic <br /> flow (both vehicle and pedestrian) and utilities. <br /> Alternative 2 takes the longest to implement but is the least expensive. Alternative 2 would <br /> cause the least disruption of the community and community services. The effectiveness of <br /> alternative 2 would be constantly monitored and additional action could be taken in the future <br /> if performance did not meet expectations <br />' <br /> Alternative ernati e 3 requires longer to implement than alternative 1 but less time than alternative 2. The <br /> cost for this alternative is greater than alternative 2 but significantly less than alternative 1. Tlus <br /> alternative would also cause disruption of community services but for a significantly shorter <br /> period of time than Alternative 1 <br /> San Joaquin County Capital Projects has selected Alternative 2, Intrinsic Remediation with <br /> Monitoring, as the most cost effective, least disruptive alternative The effectiveness of this <br /> alternative will be monitored so that additional action could be taken if intrinsic remediation is <br /> ineffective. <br /> LIAROJ ECTSZAN10Q WSASACT10NPL 41 <br />