Laserfiche WebLink
' F', <br /> 3.0. MONITORING RESULTS SUMMARY <br /> 3.1 GROUNDWATER PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND POTEN <br /> SURFACE ELEVATIONS TIOMETRIC <br /> Table 3-1 presents a summary of groundwater parameters, depths and elevations. Since <br /> r � groundwater elevations were last taken on <br /> 1 November 2000, groundwater elevations have <br /> increased by an average of 0.11 feet. <br /> Table 3-1 <br /> Groundwater Parameter, Depth and Elevation vation Data <br /> Top of <br /> Temp' Conduc- Casing Depth to 2 March 2000 <br /> Well 0C tivit Y Elevation (ft Water Water Elevation(ft <br /> H MHOS) MSL) ft MSL <br /> MW-2 22.5 6.52 1,005 <br /> NM 27.00 NM <br /> MW-2A 21.7 6.49 1,329 <br /> 11.91 27.10 -15.19 <br /> MW-3A NM NM NM <br /> 11.23 26.54 -15.31 <br /> MW-4 NM NM NM <br /> 13.46 28.09 -14.63 <br /> MW-5 <br /> NM NM NM I2.83 25.94 -13.11 <br /> MW-6 NM NM NM <br /> 13.17 26.87 -13.70 <br /> MW-7 NM NM NM <br /> 13.14 2$,63 -15.49 <br /> MW-8 NM NM NM <br /> 13.76 29.08 -15.32 <br /> L.MW-9 20.87 6.66 I,686 <br /> 12.26 27.50 -15.24 <br /> Note: NM = Not Measured <br /> x <br /> A potentiOmetric contour map developed from the water level data is presented on Figure 3-1. <br /> As in previous sampling rounds groundwater flow is generally toward the north-northeast within <br /> a trough. The horizontal groundwater gradient down the center of the trough was 0002 ft/ft. <br />_ . Ik <br /> w LXPROJECrMSANJOQWSASIQUIRPr.Wpp Q <br /> i <br />