Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I TABLE 3 <br /> COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> IEPA Method 8020 vs EPA Method 8260 <br /> Fisco Warehouse <br /> 1648 Shaw Road, Stockton, California <br /> Analyte <br /> Sample T.D. <br /> z Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes <br /> EPA EPA EPA EPA EPA EPA <br /> I8020 8260 8020 8260 8020 8260 <br /> BI-15 22 22 41 38 390 450 <br /> B1-30 430 370 240 210 1,100 1,100 <br /> BI-50 <0 005 <0 005 <0 005 <0 005 0.015 0.011 <br /> B1-60 <0 005 <0 005 <0 005 <0 005 0.014 0.012 <br /> B3-15 20 19 29 28 420 460 <br /> B3-35 0.034 0.030 0.007 0.0072 0.066 0.066 <br />' • <br /> 135-15 0.052 0.064 0.11 0.095 0.91 0 950 <br /> B5-30 720 680 310 350 1,400 1,700 <br /> Nose Analytical results for EPA Method 8260 were reported in micrograms per kilogram converted here to milligrams per kilogram for ease ofcomparison <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvtronmental,Inc <br /> I <br />