Laserfiche WebLink
7/�) Y <br /> To JDO2@TSEnv@. <br /> Cc ADE1@EngPpl@GS,FAD1@EngPpl@GS,LCD1@TesCe@Gsv <br /> From PMH4@TesCe@Gsv <br /> Subject : Line 107 sample <br /> Date : Tuesday, October 7 , 1997 at 11: 45:59 am PDT <br /> Attachment . (none) <br /> Certify : N <br /> Janet, <br /> I measured 68 mg/kg total mercury. The duplicates were 71 and 65 mg/kg. I <br /> checked for aromatic interferences and, though present, they accounted for <br /> less than 1/50th the sample response. <br /> The BTEX results came back as follows: <br /> Analyte Result Reporting Limit <br /> Benzene ND 80 <br /> Toluene ND 80 <br /> Ethyl Benzene ND 80 <br /> Xylenes 130 81 <br /> Note: Surrogate Recoveries biased high due to Hydrocarbon co-elution. <br /> Reporting Limits Increased Due To Sample Interference. <br /> Does this meet your needs or do I need to get back in touch with the <br /> contract lab to see if they can get better reporting limits for this <br /> sample? <br /> Also do fou need a Lab Test report and/or a copy of the contract Lab' s <br /> results? <br /> Peter Haight <br />