My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009123
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SAN JOAQUIN
>
345
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545671
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 12:11:07 PM
Creation date
5/19/2020 11:50:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009123
RECORD_ID
PR0545671
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003959
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T CALIFORNIA - UE042
STREET_NUMBER
345
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SAN JOAQUIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
345 N SAN JOAQUIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTERNATIONAL <br /> TECHNOLOGY <br /> CORPORATION <br />' February 18, 1993 <br /> IT Job No 190916 <br /> Mary Maeys <br /> San Joaquin County Health <br /> P O Box 2009 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> re_QA/QC Anomalies <br /> Pacific Bell Facility UE042 <br /> 345 N San Joaquin Street <br /> Stockton, CA <br /> Dear Ms. Maeys: <br /> Recently you requested a review of QA/QC anomalies which occurred during the analysis of <br /> a soil sample collected from monitoring well MW-3, located at the above referenced site. <br /> The sample in question (#MW3-4) was collected at 20 feet below grade during installation of <br /> monitoring well MW-3 on December 8, 1991 The sample was analyzed for gasoline, diesel <br /> and BTEX using EPA methods modified 8015 and 8020. Upon analysis, 7.4 ppm gasoline, <br /> 0 006 ppm ethyl benzene and 0.013 ppm xylenes were detected. It was noted on the <br /> laboratory report that the compounds detected and calculated as low boiling hydrocarbons <br /> (gasoline) are due to a petroleum mixture other than gasoline Thus was noted since the <br /> chromatographic pattern did not match the gasoline standard pattern used for chromatographic <br /> interpretation <br /> The surrogate recovery percentages achieved during analysis of this sample were outside of <br /> acceptable criteria; therefore, although the recovery percentages do not warrant rejection of <br />' these results, the results achieved must be considered as estimates (qualitative, not <br /> quantitative) As the sample analyzed was a soil sample collected during well installation, it <br /> is a one-tune collection point and is not repeatable. Furthermore, no petroleum hydrocarbons <br />' have ever been encountered m groundwater samples collected from this well, which appears <br /> to indicate that the hydrocarbons originally detected in the soul may have been anomalies due <br /> to organic hydrocarbon impact, lab contamination or a highly limited area of impact which <br /> has naturally attenuated. The hydrocarbon levels encountered were so low that it does not <br /> appear that any further investigative actions are warranted in this area <br /> Regional Office <br /> 4585 Pacheco Boulevard .Martinez California 94553 • 510-372-9100 <br /> IT Coroc-crion is a wholly owned sujusidiary of International Technology Corporation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.