My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCOTTS
>
433
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545678
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 11:34:32 AM
Creation date
5/20/2020 11:22:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545678
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005843
FACILITY_NAME
MASONITE CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
433
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCOTTS
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14704044
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
433 W SCOTTS AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additional Site Assessment and Work Plan and Conceptual Site Model <br /> PREM DOR <br /> 433 Scotts Avenue, Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br /> At the request of Dr. Sonya F. Olbrantz of Masonite International/Prem Dor, Advanced <br /> GeoEnvironmental,Inc.(AGE)has prepared this work plan and conceptual site model for 433 West <br /> Scotts Avenue,Stockton,California(site).The scope of work includes the advancement of four soil <br /> borings and one-paired cone penetrometer test boring for the collection of soil and ground water <br /> samples. The location of the site is illustrated on Figure 1.A plan of the site is illustrated on Figure <br /> 2. Additional site background information is provided in Appendix A. <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD)has directed by letter dated 21 <br /> December 2004 that a work plan be prepared to investigate the extent of contamination in the soil <br /> and ground water at the site (Appendix B). This work plan has been prepared in accordance with <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control.Board(RWQCB) guidelines for the investigation <br /> of underground storage tanks (UST) sites. <br /> 2.0. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL <br /> Based on the data collected to date from soil borings and monitoring well installations, AGE has <br /> developed a conceptual site model (CSM) (Figures 3 and 4) for the release; migration and <br /> distribution of the contaminants in the subsurface as described below: <br /> The soil profile beneath the site is generally composed of silt with sand and gravel (fill material) <br /> from surface grade to 6 feet below surface grade (bsg); clays, clayey silts and clayey sands from <br /> 6 feet bsg to 21 feet bsg; fine to coarse sand and silty sand from 21 feet to 29 feet bsg (35 feet at <br /> MW-2);clay with medium to high toughness and plasticity from 29 feet bsg to 36 feet bsg;silt from <br /> 36 feet bsg to 49 feet bsg; and fine sand from 49-feet bsg to 52 feet bsg or beyond. <br /> Since initiation of ground water monitoring in October 2003, depth to ground water measurements <br /> have fluctuated between approximately 18.5 feet and 21.feet below the top of the casing(btoc).The <br /> inferred ground water flow direction generally has been towards the northeast, four times, at <br /> gradients ranging between 0.005 ft/ft and 0.022 ft/ft; ground water flow was towards the east- <br /> northeast once at a gradient of 0.002 ft/ft. <br /> Releases of petroleum hydrocarbons occurred from the former on-site USTs. Once released to the <br /> subsurface,the contaminants migrated through the fine grained unit directly below the UST area to <br /> a vertical depth of approximately 20 feet bsg, at which point the contaminants encountered a more <br /> porous sand unit and the water table and began to migrate laterally as well as vertically;the direction <br /> of lateral migration should be towards the northeast, in the preferred ground water flow direction; <br /> however, maps of contaminant distribution suggest a more uniform spread away'from the former <br /> Advanced GeoEnviromnental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.