Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> • Southwest of Plant #3 (Boring B4) — Boring B4 was advanced in an area used to wash <br /> equipment, and an area noted to have possible soil staining.j A soil sample collected from boring <br /> B4 at two feet deep was reported to contain 222 mg/kg of TRH oil. No detected concentrations of <br /> TPH, BTEX or MTBE were reported in any other deeper soil samples. The groundwater sample <br /> collected in this area was reported to contain low detected concentrations of benzene(3.30 ug/t-), <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes. Based on this data, it appears only a very minor impact to <br /> soil or groundwater has occurred in this area. it is our judgment there is a low likelihood the <br /> identified impacts in this area would prompt regulatory directives for soil and/or groundwater <br /> remediation. <br /> • West-Southwest Corner of Property (Borings B5 & 136) = Borings B5 and E36 were advanced <br /> in the west-southwest corner of the property to assess whether the former leaking UST on the <br /> adjoining property has impacted the subject site. These borings were reported to contain no <br /> detected concentrations of TPH, BTEX or MTBE in the soil,:and no significant detections of TPH <br /> BTEX or fuel oxygenates in the groundwater samples. Based on these data, it appears there has <br /> been no significant impact to the subject site from this adjoining leaking UST issue. <br /> • In-Situ Groundwater Sampling Limitations — It is noted that in-situ groundwater samples <br /> collected using the methods described in this report, tend to have high concentrations of <br /> suspended and dissolved solids. The presence of these solids can create a bias in the <br /> groundwater analytical data, by yielding higher detected concentrations of dissolved-phase <br /> petroleum contaminants that would otherwise be detected in a sample with less solids (i.e. a <br /> sample collected from a properly constructed groundwater monitoring well). The exact extent of <br /> this potential bias is unknown, and is highly dependent upon�the actual concentrations of solids in <br /> the water sample, as well as site-specific groundwater and;contaminant chemistry. That being <br /> said, it is our judgment that the in-situ groundwater data can be ased to reliably screen for the <br /> relative concentrations of petroleum contaminants in the areas investigated, as well as to assess <br /> the absence of detected petroleum compounds in areas. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> �I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> Proj. No.: 04483-01 6 of 7 AEM f <br /> i <br /> r <br />