Laserfiche WebLink
a t <br /> 19 November 2009 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 02-0950 <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br /> of 54 feet bsg, 72 feet bsg and 100 feet bsg did not detect any constituents of concern. <br /> Analytical results of grab ground water samples are summarized in Table 3.Boring logs are <br /> presented in Appendix C.A report of findings(Additional Site Assessment Report, dated 01 <br /> November 2005) was prepared by AGE and submitted to the EHD and RWQCB. <br /> • On 21 July 2005,two soil borings(MW-4 and MW-5)were advanced on-and off-site to total <br /> depths of 35 feet bsg. Soil boring MW-4 was located on-site, east of the former UST area; <br /> soil boring MW-5 was located off-site, south-southwest of the former UST area. The pilot <br /> borings for MW-4 and MW-5 were completed as 2-inch diameter ground water monitoring <br /> wells utilizing PVC well casing and screened between 15 feet and 35 feet bsg. Laboratory <br /> analysis of soil samples did not detect any constituents of concern.Analytical results of soil <br /> samples are summarized in Table 2. Boring logs are presented in Appendix C. A report of <br /> findings (Additional Site Assessment Report, dated 01 November 2005) was prepared by <br /> AGE and submitted to the EHD and RWQCB. <br /> • On 19 March 2008, two soil borings (MW-6 and MW-7) were advanced on-site to total <br /> depths of 30 feet bsg. Soil boring MW-6 was located southeast of the former UST area; soil <br /> boring MW-7 was located adjacent the former UST area. The pilot borings for MW-6 and <br /> MW-7 were completed as 2-inch diameter ground water monitoring wells utilizing PVC well <br /> casing and screened between 10 feet and 30 feet bsg.Laboratory.analysis of soil samples did <br /> not detect any constituents of concern. Analytical results of soil samples are summarized in <br /> Table 2. Boring logs are presented in Appendix C. A report of findings (Well Installation <br /> Report, dated 19 June 2008)was prepared by AGE and submitted to the EHD and RWQCB. <br /> General lithology, selected soil sample locations, and the estimated extent of impacted soil beneath <br /> the site is depicted in cross sectional view in Figures 4 through 7 and in plan view in Figure 8. <br /> 2.4. GROUND WATER MONITORING EVENTS <br /> Between October 2003 and May 2009, twenty-three (23) ground water monitoring events were <br /> performed at the site to monitor dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in ground water <br /> and to characterize ground water flow direction and gradient on the site. Since initiation of the <br /> ground water monitoring program,ground water elevations have ranged from approximately 6 to 12 <br /> feet below the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) and depths to ground water have ranged <br /> from approximately 14 to 20 feet below the tops of the well casings (btoc). Based on the above <br /> monitoring events, ground water flow direction at the site was inferred to be generally towards the <br /> northeast and east,at low hydraulic gradients ranging between 0.002 ft/ft and 0.022 ft/ft. However, <br /> between December 2005 and May 2009, ground water flow direction at the site was inferred to be <br /> generally towards the southeast at low hydraulic gradients ranging between 0.002 ft/ft and 0.01 ft/ft. <br /> Ground water elevation data is summarized in Table 5. Ground water elevation figures depicting <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />