Laserfiche WebLink
19 November 2009 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 02-0950 <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br /> I <br /> 520 µg/1 and 300 jig/I, respectively. <br /> • Based on plots of TPH-g, TPH-d and benzene versus time (Appendix F), a definitive trend <br /> of decreasing dissolved concentrations has been evident at the site from monitoring wells <br /> MW-2 and MW-7.Based on trend line analysis of the MW-2 and MW-7 data, AGE projects <br /> that TPH-g concentrations should be non detect at well MW-2 by October 2010 and should <br /> be non detect at well MW-7 by August 2010.Trend analysis of dissolved TPH-g,TPH-d and <br /> benzene are included in Appendix F. <br /> • The approximate maximum mass of dissolved TPH in ground water prior to corrective action <br /> was estimated at 11.41 pounds of TPH, equivalent to 1.83 gallons(Figure 12;Appendix J). <br /> However, the approximate mass of dissolved TPH remaining in ground water following <br /> corrective action is estimated to be 0.09 pounds, equivalent to 0.014 gallons. The mass and <br /> volume calculations are presented in Appendix J; the lateral extent of pre- and post- <br /> corrective action dissolved TPH is depicted in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. <br /> • A sensitive receptor survey identified fourteen (14) ground water monitoring wells within <br /> 2,000 feet of this site. No other sensitive receptors were identified. Copies of the well <br /> driller's reports are included in Appendix G; a summary of water wells located from the <br /> review of well driller's reports is included in Table 7 and a location of wells are depicted on <br /> Figure 9. <br /> • A soil-vapor intrusion investigation has not been performed at the site. However, shallow <br /> impacted soil has been removed by excavation activities. <br /> • AGE concludes that petroleum hydrocarbons remaining beneath the site appear to pose <br /> minimal risk to human health and beneficial use of ground water down-gradient from the <br /> site. <br /> 8.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon data collected from the site, AGE recommends the following: <br /> • No further subsurface investigation at this time. The Masonite site has adequately assessed <br /> petroleum-impacted soil and ground water associated with the UAR. <br /> • Consideration of the facility for closure as a low risk ground water site. From previous data, <br /> AGE has documented that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in ground water at the site <br /> have been at non-detectable or near non-detectable levels. <br /> • Destruction of monitoring wells in accordance with applicable regulations as part of the site <br /> closure preparations. <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />