Laserfiche WebLink
Field observations and laboratory analyses of the selected soil samples also indicate <br /> the lateral extent of the impacted soil is contained within the area between soil borings <br /> TH-2, TH-4b, TH-5, and TH-6b Exhibits 5, 6, 7, and 8 are graphical interpretations of <br /> the laboratory data showing the TPHg concentrations in soil in profile and map view at <br /> depths of approximately 25 and 30 feet (bsg) The petroleum impacted soil at depth of <br /> 25 feet (bsg) is projected to cover an area of approximately 1 ,590 square feet, <br /> centered around the former excavation (Exhibit 7) At a depth of 30 feet (bsg) the soils <br /> become water saturated and the northwestern limit of impaction extends beyond <br /> boring TH-5 (Exhibit 8) However, based on the concentration of TPHg at TH-5, the <br /> limit of lateral extent is believed to be within the vicinity of the boring Presumably, <br /> once the downward migration of the hydrocarbons encountered groundwater the <br /> impacted area spread laterally, covering an area of approximately 3,850 square feet <br /> Laboratory analyses indicate groundwater is impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons in <br /> the vicinities of monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 The highest concentrations were <br /> encountered in MW-3 resulting in 210,000 parts per billion (ppb) for TPHg and 850 <br /> ppb for benzene <br /> Groundwater elevation measurements show a gradient of 0 021 feet/ foot to the <br /> southeast, in contrast to the western regional groundwater gradient Neither gradient, <br /> however, provides a satisfactory explanation for the distribution of hydrocarbons <br /> impacting groundwater observed at the site The high concentrations of hydrocarbons <br />• detected in MW-3 does not lend itself to any readily assessable explanation The soil <br /> at TH-6b/MW-3 was not impacted with hydrocarbons, even at a depth of 30 feet (bsg) <br /> Nonetheless, groundwater was highly impacted at MW-3, suggesting that <br /> hydrocarbons have migrated by way of lateral spreading through groundwater <br /> However, neither the westerly regional gradient, nor the southeasterly site gradient are <br /> sufficiently aligned to transport high levels of hydrocarbons from the vicinity of the <br /> former tank cluster to the northeast corner of the site In addition, the site gradient is <br /> seemingly too steep to facilitate lateral spreading normal to the gradient towards MW- <br /> 3, or up gradient towards MW-2 Consequently, the distribution of hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations observed in groundwater beneath the site may be a result of offsite <br /> contamination or seasonal variations in gradient direction thus accounting for the <br /> anomalous distribution of hydrocarbon concentrations impacting groundwater at the <br /> site. <br /> 9 0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The area containing the former underground tanks was excavated for the removal of <br /> the tanks and backfilled to surface with a mixture of pea gravel and earthen matrix A <br /> cap of non-porous material, such as asphalt, is recommended as a cover for the <br /> backfill material to prevent the introduction of water into the subsurface and to further <br /> diminish the downward migration of hydrocarbons to groundwater <br />. 16 of 17 <br />