Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' 28 December 2005 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 98-051.1 <br />' Page 4 of 4 <br />' declining since the initial sampling in 2000 <br /> • Analytes of concern were not detected above laboratory reporting limits in ground water <br /> samples collected from wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-6 and MW-8 <br />' • Hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water are not defined laterally along the up-gradient, <br /> eastern portion of the site <br />' 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon data collected from the site, AGE recommends <br /> t • Continued quarterly ground water monitoring, the third quarter 2005 ground water <br /> monitoring event was performed in September 2005 <br />' • Preparation of a work plan to assess the eastern extent of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil and ground water east of the site, on property owned by the Union Pacific Railroad <br /> Company <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based upon field <br /> measurements and analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the <br /> hydrogeologic conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a limited <br /> number of available data points (I e , ground water samples) and subsurface conditions may vary <br /> away from these data points No other warranty,expressed or implied, is made as to the professional <br /> Iinterpretations, opinions, and recommendations contained in this report <br /> I <br /> I <br /> Advaeced GeoEimronmental,Inc <br />